This introductory chapter provides an overview of the recent debate about responsibility and distributive justice. It traces the recent philosophical focus on distributive justice to John Rawls and examines two arguments in his work which might be taken to contain the seeds of the focus on responsibility in later theories of distributive justice. It examines Ronald Dworkin's ‘equality of resources’, the ‘luck egalitarianism’ of Richard Arneson and G. A. Cohen, as well as the criticisms of their work put forward by Elizabeth Anderson, Marc Fleurbaey, Susan Hurley, and Jonathan Wolff. Key concepts such as responsibility (individual and collective), luck (thin and thick; brute and option), control, desert, and equality of opportunity are delin...
Luck egalitarians argue that distributive justice should be understood in terms of our capacity to b...
Much has happened in the theory of distributive justice during the last 30 years, in the period, rou...
A presente dissertação busca realizar uma discussão pormenorizada de dois grandes teóricos da justiç...
This introductory chapter provides an overview of the recent debate about responsibility and distrib...
<p>Under what conditions are people responsible for their choices and the outcomes of those ch...
Post-rawlsian distributive justice theories: a survey The purpose of this essay is to review the li...
When considering normative concepts, such as distributive justice, one must consider both the questi...
This paper discusses the roles of responsibility and desert in egalitarian theories of justice. It c...
The paper explores theoretical shortcomings in the egalitarian theory by John Rawls and provides a c...
The concept of responsibility plays a crucial part in the debate between proponents of democratic eq...
A widespread view in moral, legal, and political philosophy, as well as in public discourse, is that...
What is a fair distribution of resources and other goods when individuals are partly responsible for...
In this paper, I argue that in the context of the redistribution-recognition debate, Rawls developed...
This dissertation addresses the importance of conceptions of responsibility for contemporary theorie...
Luck egalitarians argue that distributive justice should be understood in terms of our capacity to b...
Much has happened in the theory of distributive justice during the last 30 years, in the period, rou...
A presente dissertação busca realizar uma discussão pormenorizada de dois grandes teóricos da justiç...
This introductory chapter provides an overview of the recent debate about responsibility and distrib...
<p>Under what conditions are people responsible for their choices and the outcomes of those ch...
Post-rawlsian distributive justice theories: a survey The purpose of this essay is to review the li...
When considering normative concepts, such as distributive justice, one must consider both the questi...
This paper discusses the roles of responsibility and desert in egalitarian theories of justice. It c...
The paper explores theoretical shortcomings in the egalitarian theory by John Rawls and provides a c...
The concept of responsibility plays a crucial part in the debate between proponents of democratic eq...
A widespread view in moral, legal, and political philosophy, as well as in public discourse, is that...
What is a fair distribution of resources and other goods when individuals are partly responsible for...
In this paper, I argue that in the context of the redistribution-recognition debate, Rawls developed...
This dissertation addresses the importance of conceptions of responsibility for contemporary theorie...
Luck egalitarians argue that distributive justice should be understood in terms of our capacity to b...
Much has happened in the theory of distributive justice during the last 30 years, in the period, rou...
A presente dissertação busca realizar uma discussão pormenorizada de dois grandes teóricos da justiç...