It is shown that, contrary to an article by Adrian Cho published in SCIENCE, Bohr's drafts of his unsent letters to Heisenberg, do not prove that Heisenberg supported the construction of an atomic bomb in Germany during the war
Pauli writes about the paper by Bohr, Kramers, Slater and its experimental refutation by Geiger and ...
Pauli urges Bohr again to publish his note on the magnetic electron. He criticizes his note on Beta-...
The Einstein–Rupp experiments have been sadly neglected in the history of quantum mechanics. While t...
In response to an article by Frederick Seitz some details of the background, the course of events, a...
Controversies surrounding Heisenberg\u27s involvement with the German atomic bomb program during Wor...
No one better represents the plight and the conduct of German intellectuals under Hitler than Werner...
Werner Heisenberg, leader of the Nazi atomic bomb program, revealed the projects existence to Niels ...
Bohr's unsent letters to Heisenberg, and Heisenberg's and von Weizsäcker's descriptions of the famou...
Such is the power of technology that a new invention can change the outcome of an armed conflict fro...
It is shown that, in contrast to many interpretations in the press, the drafts of Bohr's unsent lett...
The attempt of this academic paper is to prove that Germany would not have been able to build an ato...
Many misconceptions can be found in the literature about Heisenberg's role during the war, the reaso...
Heisenberg writes on Bohr's forthcoming reply to Einstein's thought experiment (screen and two diaph...
The paper discusses the interplay of experience and representation in disciplinarily structured scie...
Pauli doesn't accept Heisenberg's arguments in his letter of the 12 November 1933 and shows by calcu...
Pauli writes about the paper by Bohr, Kramers, Slater and its experimental refutation by Geiger and ...
Pauli urges Bohr again to publish his note on the magnetic electron. He criticizes his note on Beta-...
The Einstein–Rupp experiments have been sadly neglected in the history of quantum mechanics. While t...
In response to an article by Frederick Seitz some details of the background, the course of events, a...
Controversies surrounding Heisenberg\u27s involvement with the German atomic bomb program during Wor...
No one better represents the plight and the conduct of German intellectuals under Hitler than Werner...
Werner Heisenberg, leader of the Nazi atomic bomb program, revealed the projects existence to Niels ...
Bohr's unsent letters to Heisenberg, and Heisenberg's and von Weizsäcker's descriptions of the famou...
Such is the power of technology that a new invention can change the outcome of an armed conflict fro...
It is shown that, in contrast to many interpretations in the press, the drafts of Bohr's unsent lett...
The attempt of this academic paper is to prove that Germany would not have been able to build an ato...
Many misconceptions can be found in the literature about Heisenberg's role during the war, the reaso...
Heisenberg writes on Bohr's forthcoming reply to Einstein's thought experiment (screen and two diaph...
The paper discusses the interplay of experience and representation in disciplinarily structured scie...
Pauli doesn't accept Heisenberg's arguments in his letter of the 12 November 1933 and shows by calcu...
Pauli writes about the paper by Bohr, Kramers, Slater and its experimental refutation by Geiger and ...
Pauli urges Bohr again to publish his note on the magnetic electron. He criticizes his note on Beta-...
The Einstein–Rupp experiments have been sadly neglected in the history of quantum mechanics. While t...
DOI
Add to ORKG