Charness et al. (2007b) have shown that group membership has a strong effect on individual decisions in strategic games when group membership is salient through payoff commonality. In this comment I show that their findings also apply to non-strategic decisions, even when no outgroup exists, and I relate the effects of group membership on individual decisions to joint decision making in teams. I find in an investment experiment that individual decisions with salient group membership are largely the same as team decisions. This finding bridges the literature on team decision making and on group membership effects
Models of collective action infrequently account for differences across individuals beyond a limited...
We use a laboratory experiment to compare the way groups and individuals behave in an inter-temporal...
We use a laboratory experiment to compare the way groups and individuals behave in an inter-temporal...
Charness et al. (2007b) have shown that group membership has a strong effect on individual decisions...
People who are members of a group and identify with it behave differently from people who perceive t...
Group membership is a powerful determinant of social behaviour in a variety of experimental games. I...
We revisit the phenomenon that group decisions differ systematically from decisions of individuals. ...
Abstract of associated article: We examine differences in behavior between subjects interacting with...
The success or failure of human collective action often depends on the cooperation tendencies of in...
Groups make decisions more rational than individuals do. This may depend by several factors. The lea...
According to the classic results of Galton and Condorcet, as well as in modern decision-making model...
Due to incomplete contracts, efficiency of an organization depends on willingness of individuals to ...
Many experiments comparing individual and group behavior find that groups behave more egoistically t...
An Author correction to this article was published: Scientific Reports, 9, 12869, Sept. 2019Understa...
Gowdy & Krall\u27s target article complements our recent theorizing on group behavior. In our commen...
Models of collective action infrequently account for differences across individuals beyond a limited...
We use a laboratory experiment to compare the way groups and individuals behave in an inter-temporal...
We use a laboratory experiment to compare the way groups and individuals behave in an inter-temporal...
Charness et al. (2007b) have shown that group membership has a strong effect on individual decisions...
People who are members of a group and identify with it behave differently from people who perceive t...
Group membership is a powerful determinant of social behaviour in a variety of experimental games. I...
We revisit the phenomenon that group decisions differ systematically from decisions of individuals. ...
Abstract of associated article: We examine differences in behavior between subjects interacting with...
The success or failure of human collective action often depends on the cooperation tendencies of in...
Groups make decisions more rational than individuals do. This may depend by several factors. The lea...
According to the classic results of Galton and Condorcet, as well as in modern decision-making model...
Due to incomplete contracts, efficiency of an organization depends on willingness of individuals to ...
Many experiments comparing individual and group behavior find that groups behave more egoistically t...
An Author correction to this article was published: Scientific Reports, 9, 12869, Sept. 2019Understa...
Gowdy & Krall\u27s target article complements our recent theorizing on group behavior. In our commen...
Models of collective action infrequently account for differences across individuals beyond a limited...
We use a laboratory experiment to compare the way groups and individuals behave in an inter-temporal...
We use a laboratory experiment to compare the way groups and individuals behave in an inter-temporal...