Add to ORKGThe chapter analyzes the jurisprudence of the US Supreme Court in the field of counter-terrorism, overviewing the three milestone decisions in Hamdi, Hamdan and Boumediene
Does the fight against international terrorism legitimize Governments to overextend their powers, hi...
In Dealing with Terrorism – Empirical and Normative Challenges for Fighting the Islamic State an int...
The book examines the Military Response, analyzing legal issues related to treating terrorism as an ...
The article discusses the counter-terrorism policies of the US Administration and the reaction of th...
The article contextualizes the United States (US) counter-terrorism policies from 2001 to the presen...
none3siThe dialogue focuses on the major issues of the contemporary theoretical debate on judicial r...
In the aftermath of 9/11, the United States and its allies declared war on international terrorism. ...
In this article, the importance of human rights and rule of law in countering terrorism was analyzed
The dialogue focuses on the major issues of the contemporary theoretical debate on judicial review a...
Following the atrocities of September 11, 2001, the United States has activated a highly focused and...
Although the terrorist attacks on New York and Washington, D.C., on 11 September 2001, were not the ...
The article compares the case law of the EU Court of Justice and of the US Supreme Court in the fiel...
This article aims to bring philosophical and legal aspects of the discussions of the problem of emer...
As a private attorney I have dedicated a significant part of my practice to working with or represen...
This article is divided into four sections. Section I will discuss how a rule of customary internati...
Does the fight against international terrorism legitimize Governments to overextend their powers, hi...
In Dealing with Terrorism – Empirical and Normative Challenges for Fighting the Islamic State an int...
The book examines the Military Response, analyzing legal issues related to treating terrorism as an ...
The article discusses the counter-terrorism policies of the US Administration and the reaction of th...
The article contextualizes the United States (US) counter-terrorism policies from 2001 to the presen...
none3siThe dialogue focuses on the major issues of the contemporary theoretical debate on judicial r...
In the aftermath of 9/11, the United States and its allies declared war on international terrorism. ...
In this article, the importance of human rights and rule of law in countering terrorism was analyzed
The dialogue focuses on the major issues of the contemporary theoretical debate on judicial review a...
Following the atrocities of September 11, 2001, the United States has activated a highly focused and...
Although the terrorist attacks on New York and Washington, D.C., on 11 September 2001, were not the ...
The article compares the case law of the EU Court of Justice and of the US Supreme Court in the fiel...
This article aims to bring philosophical and legal aspects of the discussions of the problem of emer...
As a private attorney I have dedicated a significant part of my practice to working with or represen...
This article is divided into four sections. Section I will discuss how a rule of customary internati...
Does the fight against international terrorism legitimize Governments to overextend their powers, hi...
In Dealing with Terrorism – Empirical and Normative Challenges for Fighting the Islamic State an int...
The book examines the Military Response, analyzing legal issues related to treating terrorism as an ...