Published online by Cambridge University Press 20 Dec 2011The article analyzes the regulation of voting rights for non-citizens in the European multilevel architecture and in the US constitutional systems. It argues that the interaction between different state and transnational laws on electoral rights in Europe has produced a challenge of inconsistency, putting under pressures those domestic regimes endowed with a very restrictive stand vis-à-vis non-citizens voting. The article explains that comparable dynamics have taken place in the US and explores the implications of the most recent jurisprudential developments taking place in the EU
Published online: 25 Mar 2015The article compares the institutional constraints that limit the poten...
The article compares the institutional constraints that limit the potential electoral impact of exte...
This article aims to identify the link between EU electoral rights and national citizenship and to s...
Published online by Cambridge University Press 20 Dec 2011The article analyzes the regulation of vot...
After balancing the arguments in favour and against voting rights for foreigners, the article rev...
First published online: 19 October 2016How does international migration impact the composition of th...
The Public International Law and Policy Group (PILPG) advises parties in peace negotiations, on draf...
The Public International Law and Policy Group (PILPG) advises parties in peace negotiations, on draf...
The Public International Law and Policy Group (PILPG) advises parties in peace negotiations, on draf...
Who should have the right to vote – and who does? This chapter focuses on these two central question...
Who should have the right to vote – and who does? This chapter focuses on these two central question...
This article aims to identify the link between EU electoral rights and national citizenship and to s...
The article compares the institutional constraints that limit the potential electoral impact of exte...
The EU grants rights to third-country nationals (TCNs) and strives to approximate their rights to th...
The article compares the institutional constraints that limit the potential electoral impact of exte...
Published online: 25 Mar 2015The article compares the institutional constraints that limit the poten...
The article compares the institutional constraints that limit the potential electoral impact of exte...
This article aims to identify the link between EU electoral rights and national citizenship and to s...
Published online by Cambridge University Press 20 Dec 2011The article analyzes the regulation of vot...
After balancing the arguments in favour and against voting rights for foreigners, the article rev...
First published online: 19 October 2016How does international migration impact the composition of th...
The Public International Law and Policy Group (PILPG) advises parties in peace negotiations, on draf...
The Public International Law and Policy Group (PILPG) advises parties in peace negotiations, on draf...
The Public International Law and Policy Group (PILPG) advises parties in peace negotiations, on draf...
Who should have the right to vote – and who does? This chapter focuses on these two central question...
Who should have the right to vote – and who does? This chapter focuses on these two central question...
This article aims to identify the link between EU electoral rights and national citizenship and to s...
The article compares the institutional constraints that limit the potential electoral impact of exte...
The EU grants rights to third-country nationals (TCNs) and strives to approximate their rights to th...
The article compares the institutional constraints that limit the potential electoral impact of exte...
Published online: 25 Mar 2015The article compares the institutional constraints that limit the poten...
The article compares the institutional constraints that limit the potential electoral impact of exte...
This article aims to identify the link between EU electoral rights and national citizenship and to s...