This paper traces a lost genealogical connection between Charles S. Peirce’s later theory of signs and contemporary work in the philosophy of language by John Perry. As is shown, despite some differences, both accounts offer what might be termed a multi-level account of meaning. Moreover, it is claimed that by adopting a ‘Peircian turn’ in his theory, Perry might overcome alleged shortcomings in his account of cognitive significance.14 page(s
The paper argues against what I call the "Fregean interpretation" of Peirce's distinction between th...
Abstract: This article analyzes the different interpretations of the concept of "meaning "...
Would be fairer to call Peirce’s philosophy of language “extensionalist” or “intensionalist”? The ex...
Abstract. Peirce was a precocious child, a 19th-century scientist who had an international reputatio...
With The Sense of Grammar, Peircean studies take a giant step forward, moving from a preoccupation w...
The major principles and systems of C. S. Peirce's ground-breaking theory of signs and signification...
Studies of C. S. Peirce’s theory of signs have typically focused on the sub-disciplines he branded g...
Charles S. Peirce (1839\u20131914) is widely recognized as America\u2019s greatest philosopher, the ...
It is curious facts that Peirce scholars tends to take the three Peircean categories for granted, wh...
Abstract According to Charles Peirce’s theory of meaning, known as pragmaticism, the meaning of sign...
Little is known about the life of Charles Sanders Peirce and perhaps even less about his system and ...
This book, officially a contribution to the subject area of Charles Peirce’s semiotics, deserves a w...
Signs Becoming Signs evinces a broad, transdisciplinary perspective based on the thinking of Charles...
Classification of signs into various kinds is a vital enterprise in semio- tic research. As early as...
In this article I connect Peirce’s early logi- co-semiotic investigations (1865-1867) to the doctrin...
The paper argues against what I call the "Fregean interpretation" of Peirce's distinction between th...
Abstract: This article analyzes the different interpretations of the concept of "meaning "...
Would be fairer to call Peirce’s philosophy of language “extensionalist” or “intensionalist”? The ex...
Abstract. Peirce was a precocious child, a 19th-century scientist who had an international reputatio...
With The Sense of Grammar, Peircean studies take a giant step forward, moving from a preoccupation w...
The major principles and systems of C. S. Peirce's ground-breaking theory of signs and signification...
Studies of C. S. Peirce’s theory of signs have typically focused on the sub-disciplines he branded g...
Charles S. Peirce (1839\u20131914) is widely recognized as America\u2019s greatest philosopher, the ...
It is curious facts that Peirce scholars tends to take the three Peircean categories for granted, wh...
Abstract According to Charles Peirce’s theory of meaning, known as pragmaticism, the meaning of sign...
Little is known about the life of Charles Sanders Peirce and perhaps even less about his system and ...
This book, officially a contribution to the subject area of Charles Peirce’s semiotics, deserves a w...
Signs Becoming Signs evinces a broad, transdisciplinary perspective based on the thinking of Charles...
Classification of signs into various kinds is a vital enterprise in semio- tic research. As early as...
In this article I connect Peirce’s early logi- co-semiotic investigations (1865-1867) to the doctrin...
The paper argues against what I call the "Fregean interpretation" of Peirce's distinction between th...
Abstract: This article analyzes the different interpretations of the concept of "meaning "...
Would be fairer to call Peirce’s philosophy of language “extensionalist” or “intensionalist”? The ex...