For many years controversy has surrounded the so-called "negative compatibility effect" (NCE), a surprising phenomenon whereby responses to a target stimulus are delayed when the target is preceded by an unconscious, response-compatible prime. According to proponents of the "self-inhibition" hypothesis, the NCE occurs when a low-level self-inhibitory mechanism supresses early motor activations that are no longer supported by perceptual evidence. This account has been debated, however, by those who regard the NCE to be a stimulus-specific phenomenon that can be explained without recourse to a self-inhibitory mechanism. The present study used a novel reach-to-touch paradigm to test whether unconscious response priming would manifest as motor ...
Execution of a response that has been primed by a backward-masked stimulus is inhibited (negative co...
Negative compatibility effects (NCEs) in the masked-prime paradigm are usually obtained when primes ...
The authors make 3 points in response to F. Schlaghecken and M. Eimer’s (2006) proposal of self-inhi...
Masked stimuli can prime responses to subsequent target stimuli, causing response benefits when the ...
In masked priming, a briefly presented prime stimulus is followed by a mask, which in turn is follow...
In masked priming tasks, participants typically respond faster to compatible than to incompatible pr...
Under certain conditions, masked primes have produced counter-intuitive negative compatibility effec...
To explain the reversal in reaction time benefits between positive and negative subliminal visuomoto...
Verleger, Jaskowski, Aydemir, van der Lubbe, and Groen (2004) and Lleras and Enns (2004) have argued...
Verleger, Jaśkowski, Aydemir, van der Lubbe, and Groen (see record 2004-21166-002) and Lleras and En...
When associations between certain visual stimuli and particular actions are learned, those stimuli b...
that negative compatibility effects (NCEs) obtained with masked primes do not reflect self-inhibitio...
Masked prime stimuli presented immediately before target stimuli in a choice reaction task give rise...
Negative compatibility effects (NCEs)-that is, slower responses to targets in related than unrelated...
Masked stimuli can cause partial motor activation and prime responses to subsequent stimuli. Under c...
Execution of a response that has been primed by a backward-masked stimulus is inhibited (negative co...
Negative compatibility effects (NCEs) in the masked-prime paradigm are usually obtained when primes ...
The authors make 3 points in response to F. Schlaghecken and M. Eimer’s (2006) proposal of self-inhi...
Masked stimuli can prime responses to subsequent target stimuli, causing response benefits when the ...
In masked priming, a briefly presented prime stimulus is followed by a mask, which in turn is follow...
In masked priming tasks, participants typically respond faster to compatible than to incompatible pr...
Under certain conditions, masked primes have produced counter-intuitive negative compatibility effec...
To explain the reversal in reaction time benefits between positive and negative subliminal visuomoto...
Verleger, Jaskowski, Aydemir, van der Lubbe, and Groen (2004) and Lleras and Enns (2004) have argued...
Verleger, Jaśkowski, Aydemir, van der Lubbe, and Groen (see record 2004-21166-002) and Lleras and En...
When associations between certain visual stimuli and particular actions are learned, those stimuli b...
that negative compatibility effects (NCEs) obtained with masked primes do not reflect self-inhibitio...
Masked prime stimuli presented immediately before target stimuli in a choice reaction task give rise...
Negative compatibility effects (NCEs)-that is, slower responses to targets in related than unrelated...
Masked stimuli can cause partial motor activation and prime responses to subsequent stimuli. Under c...
Execution of a response that has been primed by a backward-masked stimulus is inhibited (negative co...
Negative compatibility effects (NCEs) in the masked-prime paradigm are usually obtained when primes ...
The authors make 3 points in response to F. Schlaghecken and M. Eimer’s (2006) proposal of self-inhi...