In 2007, the International Court of Justice found that States could be found responsible for acts of genocide under the Genocide Convention. This thesis considers how genocidal intent can be ascribed to a State. The thesis first identifies the tests used by the ICJ and the Darfur Commission to ascribe genocidal intent to the State and then develops these tests with reference to doctrines of international law and international criminal law. The thesis then argues that a vicarious liability test is inappropriate and proposes limiting officials whose actions can be ascribed to the State to those in senior leadership positions
This Article discusses the Bosnia v. Serbia case and the Darfur Inquiry and asks whether, in coming ...
This is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from Taylor & Francis via the...
The author emphasized the complexity of determining the existence of genocidal intent as specific ch...
This study aims at analyzing the provision set forth in Article III (e) of the 1948 Genocide Convent...
Under established principles of international law, State responsibility only arises where armed grou...
In this article, we will start from the analysis of the specific intent in cases of individual crimi...
In this article, we will start from the analysis of the specific intent in cases of individual crimi...
In this article, we will start from the analysis of the specific intent in cases of individual crimi...
In the past years international law has made strides in establishing individual responsibility for c...
In 2007, the International Court of Justice (ICJ) upheld the notion that the Genocide Convention pro...
Last February, the International Court of Justice issued a judgement adjudicating claims by Bosnia a...
The thesis purports to ascertain the relevance of obligations erga omnes in the pending case of Appl...
In these brief commentaries to the U.N. Genocide Convention, I explore three criminal law modes of l...
The existence of dual system of responsibility is considered to be a constant feature of internation...
This book focuses on the concept of state responsibility for international crimes. Part I consists o...
This Article discusses the Bosnia v. Serbia case and the Darfur Inquiry and asks whether, in coming ...
This is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from Taylor & Francis via the...
The author emphasized the complexity of determining the existence of genocidal intent as specific ch...
This study aims at analyzing the provision set forth in Article III (e) of the 1948 Genocide Convent...
Under established principles of international law, State responsibility only arises where armed grou...
In this article, we will start from the analysis of the specific intent in cases of individual crimi...
In this article, we will start from the analysis of the specific intent in cases of individual crimi...
In this article, we will start from the analysis of the specific intent in cases of individual crimi...
In the past years international law has made strides in establishing individual responsibility for c...
In 2007, the International Court of Justice (ICJ) upheld the notion that the Genocide Convention pro...
Last February, the International Court of Justice issued a judgement adjudicating claims by Bosnia a...
The thesis purports to ascertain the relevance of obligations erga omnes in the pending case of Appl...
In these brief commentaries to the U.N. Genocide Convention, I explore three criminal law modes of l...
The existence of dual system of responsibility is considered to be a constant feature of internation...
This book focuses on the concept of state responsibility for international crimes. Part I consists o...
This Article discusses the Bosnia v. Serbia case and the Darfur Inquiry and asks whether, in coming ...
This is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from Taylor & Francis via the...
The author emphasized the complexity of determining the existence of genocidal intent as specific ch...