Few endogenous growth models have focused attention on the strong Porter hypothesis, that stricter environmental policies induce innovations, the benefits of which exceed the costs. A key assumption in this hypothesis is that policy strictness pushes firms to overcome some obstacles to profit maximization. We model this hypothesis by incorporating pollution and taxation in the Aghion and Griffith (2005) analysis of growth with satisficing managers. Our theoretical results predict the strong Porter hypothesis. Moreover, they suggest that the stringency of environmental policy should adjust to changes in the level of potential competition in the intermediate inputs sector
Unité de localisation : UMR 1215 UMR INRA / Univ. Grenoble 2 : Economie Appliquée de Grenoble 2007-0...
International audienceJaffe and Palmer (1997) present three distinct variants of the so-called Porte...
Environmental protection and firms' competitiveness are typically seen as conflicting elements as fi...
Few endogenous growth models have focused attention on the strong Porter hypothesis, that stricter e...
Few endogenous growth models have focused attention on the strong Porter hypothesis that stricter en...
Few endogenous growth models have focused attention on the strong Porter hypothesis, tha...
The traditional economic argument states that compliance with environmental policy diverts resources...
Jaffe et Palmer (1997) présentent trois variantes distinctes de l'hypothèse de Porter. La version « ...
Session ID 28: Natural Resource Markets and Environmental RegulationOrganized by the Industrial Orga...
In this paper, we analyze the long-term impact of an environmental policy on economic growth, pollut...
We examine pollution-reducing R&D by a monopoly firm producing a dirty product. In a dynamic framewo...
We provide a new formulation of the Porter hypothesis that we feel is in the spirit of the hypothesi...
The paper examines the Porter and induced-innovation hypotheses in a firm model where : (i) the firm...
We examine pollution-reducing R&D by a monopoly firm producing a dirty product. In a dynamic framew...
Twenty years ago, Harvard Business School economist and strategy professor Michael Porter stood conv...
Unité de localisation : UMR 1215 UMR INRA / Univ. Grenoble 2 : Economie Appliquée de Grenoble 2007-0...
International audienceJaffe and Palmer (1997) present three distinct variants of the so-called Porte...
Environmental protection and firms' competitiveness are typically seen as conflicting elements as fi...
Few endogenous growth models have focused attention on the strong Porter hypothesis, that stricter e...
Few endogenous growth models have focused attention on the strong Porter hypothesis that stricter en...
Few endogenous growth models have focused attention on the strong Porter hypothesis, tha...
The traditional economic argument states that compliance with environmental policy diverts resources...
Jaffe et Palmer (1997) présentent trois variantes distinctes de l'hypothèse de Porter. La version « ...
Session ID 28: Natural Resource Markets and Environmental RegulationOrganized by the Industrial Orga...
In this paper, we analyze the long-term impact of an environmental policy on economic growth, pollut...
We examine pollution-reducing R&D by a monopoly firm producing a dirty product. In a dynamic framewo...
We provide a new formulation of the Porter hypothesis that we feel is in the spirit of the hypothesi...
The paper examines the Porter and induced-innovation hypotheses in a firm model where : (i) the firm...
We examine pollution-reducing R&D by a monopoly firm producing a dirty product. In a dynamic framew...
Twenty years ago, Harvard Business School economist and strategy professor Michael Porter stood conv...
Unité de localisation : UMR 1215 UMR INRA / Univ. Grenoble 2 : Economie Appliquée de Grenoble 2007-0...
International audienceJaffe and Palmer (1997) present three distinct variants of the so-called Porte...
Environmental protection and firms' competitiveness are typically seen as conflicting elements as fi...