Add to ORKGOn 25 May 2021 the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) has delivered its long awaited judgment on bulk interception of personal data and mass surveillance by security and intelligence services in the case of Big Brother Watch and others v. the United Kingdom. After its chamber judgment of 13 September 2018 the case was referred to the Grand Chamber of the ECtHR. The Grand Chamber judgment elaborates a general framework of principles regarding bulk interception and confirms that the UK regime of interception of communications not only violates the privacy rights under Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) but also the journalists’ right to protect their sources, as guaranteed under Article 10 EC...
Grand Chamber judgment on freedom of expression, privacy and presumption of innocenc
Comment on judgment ECtHR Grand Chamber regarding protection of journalistic source
In the last few years, the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) has been asked many times to exami...
On 25 May 2021 the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) has delivered its lon...
Short time after the judgment in Centrum för Rättvisa v. Sweden (IRIS 2018-8:1/3) the European Court...
On 13 September 2018, more than five years after Edward Snowden revealed the existence of electronic...
Shortly after Big Brother Watch and Others v the United Kingdom, the European Court of Human Rights ...
The European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) has delivered a judgment on the compatibility of the righ...
The European Court of Human Rights delivered its long-awaited judgment in Big Brother Watch and othe...
In 2018 the European Court of Human Rights found that the UK’s Investigatory Powers Tribunal is an ‘...
In a judgment of 19 June 2018 the third section chamber of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR...
Bulk surveillance powers appear to be simultaneously contravening the general principles of European...
According to the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR), the Swedish law permitting the bulk interce...
The European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) has delivered a judgment on the rights and duties and res...
In this inaugural address I will first discuss the procedures in front of the UK IPT in the 10 Huma...
Grand Chamber judgment on freedom of expression, privacy and presumption of innocenc
Comment on judgment ECtHR Grand Chamber regarding protection of journalistic source
In the last few years, the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) has been asked many times to exami...
On 25 May 2021 the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) has delivered its lon...
Short time after the judgment in Centrum för Rättvisa v. Sweden (IRIS 2018-8:1/3) the European Court...
On 13 September 2018, more than five years after Edward Snowden revealed the existence of electronic...
Shortly after Big Brother Watch and Others v the United Kingdom, the European Court of Human Rights ...
The European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) has delivered a judgment on the compatibility of the righ...
The European Court of Human Rights delivered its long-awaited judgment in Big Brother Watch and othe...
In 2018 the European Court of Human Rights found that the UK’s Investigatory Powers Tribunal is an ‘...
In a judgment of 19 June 2018 the third section chamber of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR...
Bulk surveillance powers appear to be simultaneously contravening the general principles of European...
According to the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR), the Swedish law permitting the bulk interce...
The European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) has delivered a judgment on the rights and duties and res...
In this inaugural address I will first discuss the procedures in front of the UK IPT in the 10 Huma...
Grand Chamber judgment on freedom of expression, privacy and presumption of innocenc
Comment on judgment ECtHR Grand Chamber regarding protection of journalistic source
In the last few years, the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) has been asked many times to exami...