A one-of-a-kind resource on identifying and dealing with bias in statistical research on causal effects. Do cell phones cause cancer? Can a new curriculum increase student achievement? Determining what the real causes of such problems are, and how powerful their effects may be, are central issues in research across various fields of study. Some researchers are highly skeptical of drawing causal conclusions except in tightly controlled randomized experiments, while others discount the threats posed by different sources of bias, even in less rigorous observational studies. Bias and Causation pr
The age old quest for the golden grail of causal answers has been at the heart of science for centur...
Social scientists often estimate models from correlational data, where the independent variable has ...
In this lecture, students consider sources of bias in reporting. Specifically, they begin with an e...
BACKGROUND: Evidence based medicine aims to integrate scientific evidence, clinical experience, and ...
We expect every research study to have some inherent random error because samples cannot exactly ref...
In observational studies, identifying assumptions may fail, often quietly and without notice, leadin...
There is a substantial body of evidence that judgment and decision making are partly controlled by u...
The quality of a clinical study depends on internal and external factors. Studies have internal vali...
Case-control studies are largely used to explore differences between groups of individuals. They can...
The internal validity of an epidemiological study can be affected by random error and systematic err...
Abstract Scientific literature may be biased because of the internal validity of studies being compr...
Legitimate knowledge claims about causation have been a central concern among evaluators and applied...
Color poster with text and tables.The distinction between correlation and causation is emphasized i...
This article is part of a series featured from the Catalogue of Bias introduced in this volume of BM...
Background Epidemiologists are generally interested in the effect of an exposure on an outcome. This...
The age old quest for the golden grail of causal answers has been at the heart of science for centur...
Social scientists often estimate models from correlational data, where the independent variable has ...
In this lecture, students consider sources of bias in reporting. Specifically, they begin with an e...
BACKGROUND: Evidence based medicine aims to integrate scientific evidence, clinical experience, and ...
We expect every research study to have some inherent random error because samples cannot exactly ref...
In observational studies, identifying assumptions may fail, often quietly and without notice, leadin...
There is a substantial body of evidence that judgment and decision making are partly controlled by u...
The quality of a clinical study depends on internal and external factors. Studies have internal vali...
Case-control studies are largely used to explore differences between groups of individuals. They can...
The internal validity of an epidemiological study can be affected by random error and systematic err...
Abstract Scientific literature may be biased because of the internal validity of studies being compr...
Legitimate knowledge claims about causation have been a central concern among evaluators and applied...
Color poster with text and tables.The distinction between correlation and causation is emphasized i...
This article is part of a series featured from the Catalogue of Bias introduced in this volume of BM...
Background Epidemiologists are generally interested in the effect of an exposure on an outcome. This...
The age old quest for the golden grail of causal answers has been at the heart of science for centur...
Social scientists often estimate models from correlational data, where the independent variable has ...
In this lecture, students consider sources of bias in reporting. Specifically, they begin with an e...