Many theoretical predictions derived from quantum mechanics have been confirmed experimentally during the last 80 years. However, interpretative aspects have long been subject to debate. Among them, the question of the existence of hidden variables is still open. We review these questions, paying special attention to historical aspects, and argue that one may definitively exclude local realism on the basis of present experimental outcomes. Other interpretations of Quantum Mechanics are nevertheless not excluded
The belief that quantum mechanics (QM) does not admit a realistic interpretation is widespread. Acco...
Since the early days of quantum mechanics, a number of physicists have doubted whether quantum mecha...
This brief survey analyzes the epistemological implications about the role of observer in the interp...
In 1935 Einstein, Podolsky, and Rosen (EPR) published an important paper in which they claimed that ...
The interpretation of quantum mechanics has been a problem since its founding days. A large contribu...
The persistent interpretation problem for quantum mechanics may indicate an unwillingness to conside...
We expound an alternative to the Copenhagen interpretation of the formalism of nonrelativistic quant...
The paper argues that far from challenging—or even refuting—Bohm’s quantum theory, the no-hidden-var...
The paper argues that far from challenging – or even refuting – Bohm’s quantum theory, the no-hidden...
On October 24th, 1927, the world's most important physicists met in Brussels for what is known as th...
The topic of the present inquiry is the foundation of the statistical interpretation of quantum mech...
When statistical models are used in social sciences, there is no presumption that actual reality is ...
The purpose of this article is to present the debate established by realistic and anti-realist inter...
Is quantum mechanics about ‘states’? Or is it basically another kind of probability theory? It is ar...
The belief that quantum mechanics (QM) does not admit a realistic interpretation is widespread. Acco...
Since the early days of quantum mechanics, a number of physicists have doubted whether quantum mecha...
This brief survey analyzes the epistemological implications about the role of observer in the interp...
In 1935 Einstein, Podolsky, and Rosen (EPR) published an important paper in which they claimed that ...
The interpretation of quantum mechanics has been a problem since its founding days. A large contribu...
The persistent interpretation problem for quantum mechanics may indicate an unwillingness to conside...
We expound an alternative to the Copenhagen interpretation of the formalism of nonrelativistic quant...
The paper argues that far from challenging—or even refuting—Bohm’s quantum theory, the no-hidden-var...
The paper argues that far from challenging – or even refuting – Bohm’s quantum theory, the no-hidden...
On October 24th, 1927, the world's most important physicists met in Brussels for what is known as th...
The topic of the present inquiry is the foundation of the statistical interpretation of quantum mech...
When statistical models are used in social sciences, there is no presumption that actual reality is ...
The purpose of this article is to present the debate established by realistic and anti-realist inter...
Is quantum mechanics about ‘states’? Or is it basically another kind of probability theory? It is ar...
The belief that quantum mechanics (QM) does not admit a realistic interpretation is widespread. Acco...
Since the early days of quantum mechanics, a number of physicists have doubted whether quantum mecha...
This brief survey analyzes the epistemological implications about the role of observer in the interp...