A Comparative Research of the Aboriginal Policy in Taiwan under Dutch and Japanese Ruling

[[abstract]]荷蘭與日本是近代統治台灣的外族中的兩個國家，分別對台灣的原住民採取了不同的統治政策，當然亦對台灣的原住民造成了不同的影響。在統治政策及其所造成的影響方面，吾人是可以加以比較研究而得出若干可供參考的結論的，尤其是在原住民議題開始受到重視，而其在政治、經濟上所享受的權益與照顧與其他三大族群遠不能相比的今天，關於原住民的議題尤其值得吾人進一步地去探討與研究，以達到消彌彼此的成見與誤解、促進民族間平等與共榮境界的來臨。在本文中，筆者意圖從荷蘭與日本對台灣原住民統治所採取的模式、政策、工具及制度等方面來加以比較，採取所謂的「制度研究途徑」(Institutional Approach)，亦即由荷蘭與日本統治台灣的原住民的實際面去觀察、分析與說明。由制度的角度切入，藉由探討機關的結構、特性、權責狀況、相互關係與實際運作等層面，來深入瞭解制度運作的各個重要因素。在結論中，試圖歸納出其相似及相異點，冀能對荷治及日治時期的原住民政策有一歷史性的認識，並對荷日兩國對台灣的原住民政策指出其相似及相異點，進而分析其所以會如此之原因。在對兩國之原住民政策加以整理、歸納並分析之後，對於我國目前的原住民政策提出若干的建議，從而對後來的研究者提供一些研究參考。 Holland and Japan were the two nations who ruled Taiwan in the modern times. They had adopted the different dominant policy separately to Taiwan's original resident, And therefore had the different influence to Taiwan's original resident. On the aspect of influence of the dominant policy, we could compare the difference to research to obtain some conclusion, especially today the importance of aboriginal subject is increasing. The aboriginese who enjoy few rights on politics and economy in Taiwan, it is worth for us to discuss and to research further about the original resident's subject. Therefore, we could achieve the boundary of equal and peace between different nations. In this article, the author will compare the aboriginal policy on some aspects which Holland and Japan adopted: patterns, policies, tools and systems. The author adopts the so-called" the institutional approach "to research this subject, it is also considered to observe, to analyze and to explan the real aspects when Holland and Japan ruled Taiwan. To discuss the structure, characteristics, responsibility condition and relations of the actual operation in systems will let us understand the important attribute of the operation of system. In the conclusion, the author attempts to induce the similar and different point to have a historical understanding about the aboriginal policy that Holland and Japan adopted. The author also point out their similar and different policies, and then analyzing the reasons. After reorganizing and analyzing, the author will give some suggestion about aboriginal policy to our government, and provide some research directions to the researcher afterwards.[[abstract]]Holland and Japan were the two nations who ruled Taiwan in the modern times. They had adopted the different dominant policy separately to Taiwan's original resident, And therefore had the different influence to Taiwan's original resident. On the aspect of influence of the dominant policy, we could compare the difference to research to obtain some conclusion, especially today the importance of aboriginal subject is increasing. The aboriginese who enjoy few rights on politics and economy in Taiwan, it is worth for us to discuss and to research further about the original resident's subject. Therefore, we could achieve the boundary of equal and peace between different nations. In this article, the author will compare the aboriginal policy on some aspects which Holland and Japan adopted: patterns, policies, tools and systems. The author adopts the so-called" the institutional approach "to research this subject, it is also considered to observe, to analyze and to explan the real aspects when Holland and Japan ruled Taiwan. To discuss the structure, characteristics, responsibility condition and relations of the actual operation in systems will let us understand the important attribute of the operation of system. In the conclusion, the author attempts to induce the similar and different point to have a historical understanding about the aboriginal policy that Holland and Japan adopted. The author also point out their similar and different policies, and then analyzing the reasons. After reorganizing and analyzing, the author will give some suggestion about aboriginal policy to our government, and provide some research directions to the researcher afterwards