Stapp wrote to request some clarifications on the spinor model (roof operators, degeneracy of the vacuum and isotopic spin dependences)
Fierz writes on further calculations concerning fields with spin. He makes some remarks on Heisenber...
Pauli talks about the formulation of the present state of their considerations: a spinor model (Lagr...
Heisenberg asks questions about the perturbation theory of the relativistic Schrödinger equation, ab...
Pauli says that the spinor model may be wrong, but Källén's considerations do not yet prove this as ...
Pauli is very optimistic about the results so far. He suggests as a title for the the joint paper: "...
Pauli writes that the crucial question for the spinor model is whether a reasonable formulation of a...
Pauli expresses satisfaction over Gürsey's idea to make the neutrino rather than the vacuum responsi...
Touschek suggests building isotopic spin into a 4-component spinor theory. He discusses invariance o...
Spitzer replies to Pauli's comments on Spitzer's paper "Communication relations of interacting spino...
Pauli writes about the Rochester conference in July. He also writes about dispersion relations and t...
Pauli comments Spizer's paper on "Communication relations of interacting spinor fields" published in...
Pauli adds an extract from a letter by Weisskopf about the Geneva conference . He has a positive att...
Pauli has heard that Landau is enthusiastic about Heisenberg's and his own attempt to incorporate th...
Pauli replies to Källén's letter of the 18 March 1958. He is now sure that the explanation of strang...
Pauli makes mathematical remarks about the particles resulting from a spinor model. He writes on the...
Fierz writes on further calculations concerning fields with spin. He makes some remarks on Heisenber...
Pauli talks about the formulation of the present state of their considerations: a spinor model (Lagr...
Heisenberg asks questions about the perturbation theory of the relativistic Schrödinger equation, ab...
Pauli says that the spinor model may be wrong, but Källén's considerations do not yet prove this as ...
Pauli is very optimistic about the results so far. He suggests as a title for the the joint paper: "...
Pauli writes that the crucial question for the spinor model is whether a reasonable formulation of a...
Pauli expresses satisfaction over Gürsey's idea to make the neutrino rather than the vacuum responsi...
Touschek suggests building isotopic spin into a 4-component spinor theory. He discusses invariance o...
Spitzer replies to Pauli's comments on Spitzer's paper "Communication relations of interacting spino...
Pauli writes about the Rochester conference in July. He also writes about dispersion relations and t...
Pauli comments Spizer's paper on "Communication relations of interacting spinor fields" published in...
Pauli adds an extract from a letter by Weisskopf about the Geneva conference . He has a positive att...
Pauli has heard that Landau is enthusiastic about Heisenberg's and his own attempt to incorporate th...
Pauli replies to Källén's letter of the 18 March 1958. He is now sure that the explanation of strang...
Pauli makes mathematical remarks about the particles resulting from a spinor model. He writes on the...
Fierz writes on further calculations concerning fields with spin. He makes some remarks on Heisenber...
Pauli talks about the formulation of the present state of their considerations: a spinor model (Lagr...
Heisenberg asks questions about the perturbation theory of the relativistic Schrödinger equation, ab...
Add to ORKG