Add to ORKGPauli says that the spinor model may be wrong, but Källén's considerations do not yet prove this as Pauli undertakes to demonstrate
Pauli replies to Lüders' letter of 30 June. He makes remarks about anticommutation of different spin...
Pauli writes about the impossibility of half-integer spin in a theory with a four-vector Psi which i...
Pauli thanks Källén for his reply. He objects to his views on the gauge-invariance. He writes on the...
Pauli writes that the crucial question for the spinor model is whether a reasonable formulation of a...
Pauli replies to Källén's letter of the 18 March 1958. He is now sure that the explanation of strang...
Pauli talks about the formulation of the present state of their considerations: a spinor model (Lagr...
Pauli expresses satisfaction over Gürsey's idea to make the neutrino rather than the vacuum responsi...
Pauli adds an extract from a letter by Weisskopf about the Geneva conference . He has a positive att...
Pauli makes mathematical remarks about the particles resulting from a spinor model. He writes on the...
Pauli writes on the treatment of the eigenvalue problem. The only existing method is the Tamm-Dancof...
Pauli replies to Heisenberg's letter of 15 March. He emphasizes the discrepancy of their respective ...
Pauli writes of Landau's paper "The quantum theory of fields" for the Bohr-Festschrift and comments ...
Gürsey replies to three letters by Pauli of the 26, 27 February and the 1 March 1958. He writes on t...
Stapp wrote to request some clarifications on the spinor model (roof operators, degeneracy of the va...
Pauli writes about Thirring's reply to Pauli's criticism. He talks about an error in Pauli's last le...
Pauli replies to Lüders' letter of 30 June. He makes remarks about anticommutation of different spin...
Pauli writes about the impossibility of half-integer spin in a theory with a four-vector Psi which i...
Pauli thanks Källén for his reply. He objects to his views on the gauge-invariance. He writes on the...
Pauli writes that the crucial question for the spinor model is whether a reasonable formulation of a...
Pauli replies to Källén's letter of the 18 March 1958. He is now sure that the explanation of strang...
Pauli talks about the formulation of the present state of their considerations: a spinor model (Lagr...
Pauli expresses satisfaction over Gürsey's idea to make the neutrino rather than the vacuum responsi...
Pauli adds an extract from a letter by Weisskopf about the Geneva conference . He has a positive att...
Pauli makes mathematical remarks about the particles resulting from a spinor model. He writes on the...
Pauli writes on the treatment of the eigenvalue problem. The only existing method is the Tamm-Dancof...
Pauli replies to Heisenberg's letter of 15 March. He emphasizes the discrepancy of their respective ...
Pauli writes of Landau's paper "The quantum theory of fields" for the Bohr-Festschrift and comments ...
Gürsey replies to three letters by Pauli of the 26, 27 February and the 1 March 1958. He writes on t...
Stapp wrote to request some clarifications on the spinor model (roof operators, degeneracy of the va...
Pauli writes about Thirring's reply to Pauli's criticism. He talks about an error in Pauli's last le...
Pauli replies to Lüders' letter of 30 June. He makes remarks about anticommutation of different spin...
Pauli writes about the impossibility of half-integer spin in a theory with a four-vector Psi which i...
Pauli thanks Källén for his reply. He objects to his views on the gauge-invariance. He writes on the...