Add to ORKGPauli writes that the crucial question for the spinor model is whether a reasonable formulation of an eigenvalue problem can be found for the masses of the particles. He talks about a special question concerning interaction in quantum mechanics: do products of field operators for the same point have a well defined meaning? He does not accept Källén's arguments against the spinor model
Pauli talks about a paper by Thirring on "a soluble relativistic field theory", dealing with Heisenb...
Pauli comments Spizer's paper on "Communication relations of interacting spinor fields" published in...
Heisenberg asks questions about the perturbation theory of the relativistic Schrödinger equation, ab...
Pauli says that the spinor model may be wrong, but Källén's considerations do not yet prove this as ...
Pauli writes on the treatment of the eigenvalue problem. The only existing method is the Tamm-Dancof...
Pauli writes of Landau's paper "The quantum theory of fields" for the Bohr-Festschrift and comments ...
Gürsey replies to three letters by Pauli of the 26, 27 February and the 1 March 1958. He writes on t...
Pauli makes mathematical remarks about the particles resulting from a spinor model. He writes on the...
Pauli replies to Källén's letter of the 18 March 1958. He is now sure that the explanation of strang...
Pauli writes about the conference in Geneva, saying that the mirror-problem remains unsolved, and th...
Pauli replies to Heisenberg's letter of 15 March. He emphasizes the discrepancy of their respective ...
Ehrenfest sends a short note in which he expresses his doubts as to the separability of the operator...
Pauli adds an extract from a letter by Weisskopf about the Geneva conference . He has a positive att...
Pauli expresses satisfaction over Gürsey's idea to make the neutrino rather than the vacuum responsi...
Pauli talks about the formulation of the present state of their considerations: a spinor model (Lagr...
Pauli talks about a paper by Thirring on "a soluble relativistic field theory", dealing with Heisenb...
Pauli comments Spizer's paper on "Communication relations of interacting spinor fields" published in...
Heisenberg asks questions about the perturbation theory of the relativistic Schrödinger equation, ab...
Pauli says that the spinor model may be wrong, but Källén's considerations do not yet prove this as ...
Pauli writes on the treatment of the eigenvalue problem. The only existing method is the Tamm-Dancof...
Pauli writes of Landau's paper "The quantum theory of fields" for the Bohr-Festschrift and comments ...
Gürsey replies to three letters by Pauli of the 26, 27 February and the 1 March 1958. He writes on t...
Pauli makes mathematical remarks about the particles resulting from a spinor model. He writes on the...
Pauli replies to Källén's letter of the 18 March 1958. He is now sure that the explanation of strang...
Pauli writes about the conference in Geneva, saying that the mirror-problem remains unsolved, and th...
Pauli replies to Heisenberg's letter of 15 March. He emphasizes the discrepancy of their respective ...
Ehrenfest sends a short note in which he expresses his doubts as to the separability of the operator...
Pauli adds an extract from a letter by Weisskopf about the Geneva conference . He has a positive att...
Pauli expresses satisfaction over Gürsey's idea to make the neutrino rather than the vacuum responsi...
Pauli talks about the formulation of the present state of their considerations: a spinor model (Lagr...
Pauli talks about a paper by Thirring on "a soluble relativistic field theory", dealing with Heisenb...
Pauli comments Spizer's paper on "Communication relations of interacting spinor fields" published in...
Heisenberg asks questions about the perturbation theory of the relativistic Schrödinger equation, ab...