Add to ORKGJordan replies to Pauli's two letters. He agrees about the necessity for clarification of the physical significance of his formulae but he has some reservations as regards Pauli's criticism
Lanczos thanks Pauli for his reply to his letter of 27 Nov, which clarifies the point in question
Weizsäcker comments on Pauli's essay on Kepler. He agrees, with certain qualifications, with Pauli's...
Fierz comments on Jordan's attempt at deriving the gravitational equations from a variation-principl...
Lüders thanks Pauli for his comments on his work. He makes some remarks about details of Pauli's man...
Jordan replies to Pauli's questions as regards Jordan's cosmology with a changing gravitational cons...
Dürr's reply to pauli's letters of 24 and 26-03-1958 makes some suggestions for the improvement of h...
Jordan replies to Pauli's letter of the 17 July 1953. He gives certain results of the calculations o...
Jordan replies to Pauli's letter of the 1 October 1952 about the relation of Jordan's "projective" c...
This letter is a reply to Pauli's letter of 17-03-1958. Dürranswers to Pauli's six questions and wri...
Elsasser replies to Pauli's letter concerning Elsasser's book. He clarifies several points criticize...
Lichnerowicz reply to Pauli's letter of 15 Nov which has crossed his letter. Pauli's formula is iden...
Pauli makes further critical remarks about Jordan's cosmology. He writes that some of his assumption...
Lüders replies to Pauli's letter of 3 Dec as regards the significance of "hermiticity" for his calcu...
Uhlenbeck responds to Pauli's criticism to his work with Kahn on condensation. He makes comparisons ...
Fierz replies to a letter by Pauli on interactions and the limitations of linear theories
Lanczos thanks Pauli for his reply to his letter of 27 Nov, which clarifies the point in question
Weizsäcker comments on Pauli's essay on Kepler. He agrees, with certain qualifications, with Pauli's...
Fierz comments on Jordan's attempt at deriving the gravitational equations from a variation-principl...
Lüders thanks Pauli for his comments on his work. He makes some remarks about details of Pauli's man...
Jordan replies to Pauli's questions as regards Jordan's cosmology with a changing gravitational cons...
Dürr's reply to pauli's letters of 24 and 26-03-1958 makes some suggestions for the improvement of h...
Jordan replies to Pauli's letter of the 17 July 1953. He gives certain results of the calculations o...
Jordan replies to Pauli's letter of the 1 October 1952 about the relation of Jordan's "projective" c...
This letter is a reply to Pauli's letter of 17-03-1958. Dürranswers to Pauli's six questions and wri...
Elsasser replies to Pauli's letter concerning Elsasser's book. He clarifies several points criticize...
Lichnerowicz reply to Pauli's letter of 15 Nov which has crossed his letter. Pauli's formula is iden...
Pauli makes further critical remarks about Jordan's cosmology. He writes that some of his assumption...
Lüders replies to Pauli's letter of 3 Dec as regards the significance of "hermiticity" for his calcu...
Uhlenbeck responds to Pauli's criticism to his work with Kahn on condensation. He makes comparisons ...
Fierz replies to a letter by Pauli on interactions and the limitations of linear theories
Lanczos thanks Pauli for his reply to his letter of 27 Nov, which clarifies the point in question
Weizsäcker comments on Pauli's essay on Kepler. He agrees, with certain qualifications, with Pauli's...
Fierz comments on Jordan's attempt at deriving the gravitational equations from a variation-principl...