Pauli replies to some points in Heisenberg's letters (18th April 1947 and 20th June 1947). The idea of an analytical continuation of the S-matrix is a failure. He is scepticalabout future theories, especially as the problem of the dimensionless constant e2/(n.c) is not solved. He doesn't believe in the existence of a universal length. He does not believe either in the mathematical existence of a convergent quantum electrodynamics with arbitrary e2/(n.c). He writes of his impending visit to Sweden and Copenhagen
Heisenberg replies to Pauli's letter and detailed discussion of Källén's arguments concerning Heisen...
Letter amplifying his cable from the boat to the USA, urging Heisenberg not to publish now and not t...
Pauli replies to Heisenberg's letter of 13 April. He criticizes his pressing for a premature publica...
Heisenberg replies to objections from Pauli regarding his work on quantum electrodynamics, in partic...
Pauli is against Heisenberg's approach to quantum electrodynamics. It is impossible to work only wit...
Pauli replies to Heisenberg's letter concerning e$^{2}$. He gives an outline of how far a future the...
Pauli hopes to come to Copenhagen and to discuss radiation problems. He has now to write a Handbuch ...
Pauli replies to Heisenberg's letter of 15 March. He emphasizes the discrepancy of their respective ...
Pauli makes further remarks about the formulation of certain results in Heisenberg's manuscript
Pauli replies to Heisenberg's letter of 25 December, especially about field-operators. He writes abo...
Pauli does not believe that there exists a key for derivation of a quantum S-matrix from an arbitrar...
Pauli comments in detail on the paper by Einstein-Podolski-Rosen and suggest that Heisenberg should ...
Pauli replies to Heisenberg's letter of 27 February. He thinks that understanding between him and He...
Pauli replies to Heisenberg's letter of 30 January. He talks about the mirror-world, a problem vital...
Heisenberg writes on a talk Heisenberg had with Bohr about the theory of holes. The reason why an ar...
Heisenberg replies to Pauli's letter and detailed discussion of Källén's arguments concerning Heisen...
Letter amplifying his cable from the boat to the USA, urging Heisenberg not to publish now and not t...
Pauli replies to Heisenberg's letter of 13 April. He criticizes his pressing for a premature publica...
Heisenberg replies to objections from Pauli regarding his work on quantum electrodynamics, in partic...
Pauli is against Heisenberg's approach to quantum electrodynamics. It is impossible to work only wit...
Pauli replies to Heisenberg's letter concerning e$^{2}$. He gives an outline of how far a future the...
Pauli hopes to come to Copenhagen and to discuss radiation problems. He has now to write a Handbuch ...
Pauli replies to Heisenberg's letter of 15 March. He emphasizes the discrepancy of their respective ...
Pauli makes further remarks about the formulation of certain results in Heisenberg's manuscript
Pauli replies to Heisenberg's letter of 25 December, especially about field-operators. He writes abo...
Pauli does not believe that there exists a key for derivation of a quantum S-matrix from an arbitrar...
Pauli comments in detail on the paper by Einstein-Podolski-Rosen and suggest that Heisenberg should ...
Pauli replies to Heisenberg's letter of 27 February. He thinks that understanding between him and He...
Pauli replies to Heisenberg's letter of 30 January. He talks about the mirror-world, a problem vital...
Heisenberg writes on a talk Heisenberg had with Bohr about the theory of holes. The reason why an ar...
Heisenberg replies to Pauli's letter and detailed discussion of Källén's arguments concerning Heisen...
Letter amplifying his cable from the boat to the USA, urging Heisenberg not to publish now and not t...
Pauli replies to Heisenberg's letter of 13 April. He criticizes his pressing for a premature publica...