Add to ORKGThis letter is a reply to Pauli's letter of 17-03-1958. Dürranswers to Pauli's six questions and writes about some corrections he made of his own paper
Schafroth replies to Pauli's critics on his supraconductivity paper. He writes a postscriptum as reg...
Gürsey replies to some points in Pauli's last letter on the Langrangian, on the quantum numbers and ...
Bohr asks for Pauli's comments on his paper with Kramer and Slater and for suggestions on how to imp...
Dürr's reply to pauli's letters of 24 and 26-03-1958 makes some suggestions for the improvement of h...
Lüders thanks Pauli for his comments on his work. He makes some remarks about details of Pauli's man...
Elsasser replies to Pauli's letter concerning Elsasser's book. He clarifies several points criticize...
Heisenberg replies to some of the questions raised in Pauli's last letters (of 3 and 4 March
Thirring replies to Pauli's question in his last letter. He says that the answer is in Michel's pape...
Heisenberg replies to the objections of Pauli in his last two letters, concerning the second draft o...
Jordan replies to Pauli's two letters. He agrees about the necessity for clarification of the physic...
Lanczos thanks Pauli for his reply to his letter of 27 Nov, which clarifies the point in question
Gürsey replies to three letters by Pauli of the 26, 27 February and the 1 March 1958. He writes on t...
Fierz sends some additions to his letter of the 29th September 1954 (fierz_0016-15r)
Gürsey replies to Pauli's letter of the 17 February 1958, especially about quantum number assignment...
Polvani forwards the written response by M Born to Pauli's criticism at Firenze Conference in 1949 (...
Schafroth replies to Pauli's critics on his supraconductivity paper. He writes a postscriptum as reg...
Gürsey replies to some points in Pauli's last letter on the Langrangian, on the quantum numbers and ...
Bohr asks for Pauli's comments on his paper with Kramer and Slater and for suggestions on how to imp...
Dürr's reply to pauli's letters of 24 and 26-03-1958 makes some suggestions for the improvement of h...
Lüders thanks Pauli for his comments on his work. He makes some remarks about details of Pauli's man...
Elsasser replies to Pauli's letter concerning Elsasser's book. He clarifies several points criticize...
Heisenberg replies to some of the questions raised in Pauli's last letters (of 3 and 4 March
Thirring replies to Pauli's question in his last letter. He says that the answer is in Michel's pape...
Heisenberg replies to the objections of Pauli in his last two letters, concerning the second draft o...
Jordan replies to Pauli's two letters. He agrees about the necessity for clarification of the physic...
Lanczos thanks Pauli for his reply to his letter of 27 Nov, which clarifies the point in question
Gürsey replies to three letters by Pauli of the 26, 27 February and the 1 March 1958. He writes on t...
Fierz sends some additions to his letter of the 29th September 1954 (fierz_0016-15r)
Gürsey replies to Pauli's letter of the 17 February 1958, especially about quantum number assignment...
Polvani forwards the written response by M Born to Pauli's criticism at Firenze Conference in 1949 (...
Schafroth replies to Pauli's critics on his supraconductivity paper. He writes a postscriptum as reg...
Gürsey replies to some points in Pauli's last letter on the Langrangian, on the quantum numbers and ...
Bohr asks for Pauli's comments on his paper with Kramer and Slater and for suggestions on how to imp...