Commentary article entitled "The top 100 paper" published in Nature 2014, 514(7524), 550-553 by R Van Noorden, B Maher & R Nuzzo. Although we know that the main focus of this paper is on the data extracted from Web of Science, we want to point out some discrepancies in this Google Scholar league table. Investigating on the presence of highly cited documents in Google Scholar (see http://arxiv.org/abs/1410.8464), we find certain inconsistencies (instability in the allocation of citations and identification and linkage of versions.EC3: Evaluacion de la Ciencia y de la Comunicacion Cientific
[EN] Despite citation counts from Google Scholar (GS), Web of Science (WoS), and Scopus being widely...
Abstract. An increasing number of online information services calculate and report the citedness sco...
This study uses citation analysis from two citation tracking databases, Google Scholar (GS) and ISI ...
[EN] The main objective of this paper is to empirically test whether the identification of highly ci...
The main objective of this paper is to empirically test whether the identification of highly-cited d...
This study explores the extent to which bibliometric indicators based on counts of highly-cited docu...
The main objective of this paper is to identify and define the core characteristics of the set of hi...
The main objective of this paper is to identify and define the core characteristics of the set of hi...
Google Scholar is one of the major academic search engines but its ranking algorithm for academic ar...
This paper reviews the most significant features of Google Scholar Metrics, pointing out their stren...
This is an accepted manuscript of an article published by Elsevier in Journal of Informetrics on 05/...
This study uses citation analysis from two citation tracking databases, Google Scholar (GS) and ISI ...
This study uses citation analysis from two citation tracking databases, Google Scholar (GS) and ISI ...
Scholarly impact may be metricized using an author's total number of citations as a stand-in for rea...
Despite citation counts from Google Scholar (GS), Web of Science (WoS), and Scopus being widely cons...
[EN] Despite citation counts from Google Scholar (GS), Web of Science (WoS), and Scopus being widely...
Abstract. An increasing number of online information services calculate and report the citedness sco...
This study uses citation analysis from two citation tracking databases, Google Scholar (GS) and ISI ...
[EN] The main objective of this paper is to empirically test whether the identification of highly ci...
The main objective of this paper is to empirically test whether the identification of highly-cited d...
This study explores the extent to which bibliometric indicators based on counts of highly-cited docu...
The main objective of this paper is to identify and define the core characteristics of the set of hi...
The main objective of this paper is to identify and define the core characteristics of the set of hi...
Google Scholar is one of the major academic search engines but its ranking algorithm for academic ar...
This paper reviews the most significant features of Google Scholar Metrics, pointing out their stren...
This is an accepted manuscript of an article published by Elsevier in Journal of Informetrics on 05/...
This study uses citation analysis from two citation tracking databases, Google Scholar (GS) and ISI ...
This study uses citation analysis from two citation tracking databases, Google Scholar (GS) and ISI ...
Scholarly impact may be metricized using an author's total number of citations as a stand-in for rea...
Despite citation counts from Google Scholar (GS), Web of Science (WoS), and Scopus being widely cons...
[EN] Despite citation counts from Google Scholar (GS), Web of Science (WoS), and Scopus being widely...
Abstract. An increasing number of online information services calculate and report the citedness sco...
This study uses citation analysis from two citation tracking databases, Google Scholar (GS) and ISI ...