Marx, keynes and heterodoxy

Even within heterodoxy there is argument about what should and should not be included or why (Lawson 2006; King 2008; Milonakis & Fine 2009; Dow 2011). This paper proposes that important and convergent markers exist in the concerns of classical contributors to economic discourse, from the beginning of the nineteenth century to the mid-twentieth century, as well as from the more recent revival of the same issues in social science broadly. Some problems of demarcation and method will probably remain unresolved, but imprecision does not negate the analytical potential of non-mainstream traditions in political economy