Objective: We aimed to determine the validity of two risk scores for patients with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer in different European settings, in patients with primary tumours. Methods: We included 1,892 patients with primary stage Ta or T1 non-muscle invasive bladder cancer who underwent a transurethral resection in Spain (n = 973), the Netherlands (n = 639), or Denmark (n = 280). We evaluated recurrence-free survival and progression-free survival according to the European Organisation for Research
Objective: We aimed to determine the validity of two risk scores for patients with non-muscle invasi...
Introduction:We determined the recurrence and progression at 1 year in Patients with non-muscle-inva...
Introduction:We determined the recurrence and progression at 1 year in Patients with non-muscle-inva...
We aimed to determine the validity of two risk scores for patients with non-muscle invasive bladder ...
Abstract Objective: We aimed to determine the validity of two risk scores for patients with non-mus...
Objective: We aimed to determine the validity of two risk scores for patients with non-muscle invasi...
Objective: We aimed to determine the validity of two risk scores for patients with non-muscle invasi...
Objective: We aimed to determine the validity of two risk scores for patients with non-muscle invasi...
Objective: We aimed to determine the validity of two risk scores for patients with non-muscle invasi...
OBJECTIVE: We aimed to determine the validity of two risk scores for patients with non-muscle invasi...
textabstractObjective: We aimed to determine the validity of two risk scores for patients with non-m...
<div><p>Objective</p><p>We aimed to determine the validity of two risk scores for patients with non-...
We aimed to determine the validity of two risk scores for patients with non-muscle invasive bladder ...
We aimed to determine the validity of two risk scores for patients with non-muscle invasive bladder ...
We aimed to determine the validity of two risk scores for patients with non-muscle invasive bladder ...
Objective: We aimed to determine the validity of two risk scores for patients with non-muscle invasi...
Introduction:We determined the recurrence and progression at 1 year in Patients with non-muscle-inva...
Introduction:We determined the recurrence and progression at 1 year in Patients with non-muscle-inva...
We aimed to determine the validity of two risk scores for patients with non-muscle invasive bladder ...
Abstract Objective: We aimed to determine the validity of two risk scores for patients with non-mus...
Objective: We aimed to determine the validity of two risk scores for patients with non-muscle invasi...
Objective: We aimed to determine the validity of two risk scores for patients with non-muscle invasi...
Objective: We aimed to determine the validity of two risk scores for patients with non-muscle invasi...
Objective: We aimed to determine the validity of two risk scores for patients with non-muscle invasi...
OBJECTIVE: We aimed to determine the validity of two risk scores for patients with non-muscle invasi...
textabstractObjective: We aimed to determine the validity of two risk scores for patients with non-m...
<div><p>Objective</p><p>We aimed to determine the validity of two risk scores for patients with non-...
We aimed to determine the validity of two risk scores for patients with non-muscle invasive bladder ...
We aimed to determine the validity of two risk scores for patients with non-muscle invasive bladder ...
We aimed to determine the validity of two risk scores for patients with non-muscle invasive bladder ...
Objective: We aimed to determine the validity of two risk scores for patients with non-muscle invasi...
Introduction:We determined the recurrence and progression at 1 year in Patients with non-muscle-inva...
Introduction:We determined the recurrence and progression at 1 year in Patients with non-muscle-inva...