Add to ORKGThe first two sections of this paper jointly comprise an edited version of the commentary I presented in the panel discussion of Harald R. Wohlrapp, The concept of argument: A philosophical foundation at the OSSA 11 conference, May 2016. My principal focus was on a claim Wohlrapp makes about the extent to which his concept of justification is "reconcilable" with the views of current philosophers about justifications. Following the conference, Wohlrapp sent me a response to my commentary. In section 3, I report and reply to three of the comments he made in his response
In her paper “Argumentation theory and the conception of epistemic justification”, Lilian Bermejo-Lu...
The outline of the paper is as follows: in Section 1, I first introduce what I hold to be the two ba...
Suppose we are prepared to conceive the meaning of a sentence as a classification criterion which en...
The first two sections of this paper jointly comprise an edited version of the commentary I presente...
bstract: Harald Wohlrapp’s The Concept of Argument has made a significant contribution to the argume...
The paper provides a series of responses to the papers published in Vol. 37, No. 3, of this journal ...
The last number of Informal Logic, Vol. 37, No. 3, was devoted to a discussion by five scholars of v...
I would first like to congratulate Harald Wohlrapp on the substantial success of his book on the phi...
When a new theory of argumentation becomes available on the English-speaking market, such as it is h...
Open access article.This paper aims to determine whether rhetoric has a place in Wohlrapp's theory o...
Abstract: In a stage-wise view of the process of constructing and realizing a system of freedoms and...
Justification is a basic component of reasoning because it provides us with the warrant which should...
Turri argues against what he calls an “orthodox” view of the relationship between propositional and ...
I’d like to thank my critics for their thoughtful and challenging commentary. I appreciate the time ...
I argue that Forst’s justification paradigm is less radical than claimed in that it fails to establi...
In her paper “Argumentation theory and the conception of epistemic justification”, Lilian Bermejo-Lu...
The outline of the paper is as follows: in Section 1, I first introduce what I hold to be the two ba...
Suppose we are prepared to conceive the meaning of a sentence as a classification criterion which en...
The first two sections of this paper jointly comprise an edited version of the commentary I presente...
bstract: Harald Wohlrapp’s The Concept of Argument has made a significant contribution to the argume...
The paper provides a series of responses to the papers published in Vol. 37, No. 3, of this journal ...
The last number of Informal Logic, Vol. 37, No. 3, was devoted to a discussion by five scholars of v...
I would first like to congratulate Harald Wohlrapp on the substantial success of his book on the phi...
When a new theory of argumentation becomes available on the English-speaking market, such as it is h...
Open access article.This paper aims to determine whether rhetoric has a place in Wohlrapp's theory o...
Abstract: In a stage-wise view of the process of constructing and realizing a system of freedoms and...
Justification is a basic component of reasoning because it provides us with the warrant which should...
Turri argues against what he calls an “orthodox” view of the relationship between propositional and ...
I’d like to thank my critics for their thoughtful and challenging commentary. I appreciate the time ...
I argue that Forst’s justification paradigm is less radical than claimed in that it fails to establi...
In her paper “Argumentation theory and the conception of epistemic justification”, Lilian Bermejo-Lu...
The outline of the paper is as follows: in Section 1, I first introduce what I hold to be the two ba...
Suppose we are prepared to conceive the meaning of a sentence as a classification criterion which en...