Trudy Govier argues in The Philosophy of Argument that adversariality in argumentation can be kept to a necessary minimum. On her ac-count, politeness can limit the ancillary adversariality of hostile culture but a degree of logical opposition will remain part of argumentation, and perhaps all reasoning. Argumentation cannot be purified by politeness in the way she hopes, nor does reasoning even in the discursive context of argumentation demand opposition. Such hopes assume an idealized politeness free from gender, and reasoners with inhuman or at least highly privileged capabilities and no need to learn from others or share understanding
The aim of this paper is to offer some guidelines for an explanation of politeness in the framework ...
Munazarah procedure determines who has the right to speak and who should remain silent until his tur...
Starting from Sperber and Mercier’s theory (2011) on the relationship between reasoning and arguing...
Trudy Govier argues in The Philosophy of Argument that adversariality in argumentation can be kept t...
This essay argues that ideals of cooperation or adversariality in argumentation are not equally atta...
Beginning with my 1999 account in The Philosophy of Argument, this essay explores views about advers...
Abstract Human activities are conditioned by proper use of language. The primary use of language is...
This article explores the development and testing of two popular communication instruments: argument...
Evaluation is an important aspect of (im)politeness, and this article explores it from an interdisci...
This essay gives a comprehensive theoretical background and then uses observations of how FTAs can b...
This paper addresses the relationship between norms of reasoning and norms of politeness: To what ex...
Keywords: Politeness, Face, Face Threatening Act (FTA), Politeness Strategies, DebateLanguage is a t...
While admetting the general principle of politeness as assimilated to face-work, we think that we ha...
Calls for civility feature prominently in public discourse, and the concept has received growing att...
Since at least the 1980s, the role of adversariality in argumentation has been extensively discussed...
The aim of this paper is to offer some guidelines for an explanation of politeness in the framework ...
Munazarah procedure determines who has the right to speak and who should remain silent until his tur...
Starting from Sperber and Mercier’s theory (2011) on the relationship between reasoning and arguing...
Trudy Govier argues in The Philosophy of Argument that adversariality in argumentation can be kept t...
This essay argues that ideals of cooperation or adversariality in argumentation are not equally atta...
Beginning with my 1999 account in The Philosophy of Argument, this essay explores views about advers...
Abstract Human activities are conditioned by proper use of language. The primary use of language is...
This article explores the development and testing of two popular communication instruments: argument...
Evaluation is an important aspect of (im)politeness, and this article explores it from an interdisci...
This essay gives a comprehensive theoretical background and then uses observations of how FTAs can b...
This paper addresses the relationship between norms of reasoning and norms of politeness: To what ex...
Keywords: Politeness, Face, Face Threatening Act (FTA), Politeness Strategies, DebateLanguage is a t...
While admetting the general principle of politeness as assimilated to face-work, we think that we ha...
Calls for civility feature prominently in public discourse, and the concept has received growing att...
Since at least the 1980s, the role of adversariality in argumentation has been extensively discussed...
The aim of this paper is to offer some guidelines for an explanation of politeness in the framework ...
Munazarah procedure determines who has the right to speak and who should remain silent until his tur...
Starting from Sperber and Mercier’s theory (2011) on the relationship between reasoning and arguing...