I have written about the bad effects of Revise & Resubmit (R&R) earlier (here and here), but I keep hearing from people who see no problems with this type of editorial decision in journal editing, so I need come back to it. This is also because I hear more and more about the unhappiness that it causes in people’s lives, and I feel that much of this is unnecessary. Rejection of applications for jobs and applications for funding is unavoidable, because the amount of money is limited. But the w..
While it seems obvious that withdrawing papers, which contain errors or misconduct, helps to keep th...
While it seems obvious that withdrawing papers, which contain errors or misconduct, helps to keep th...
Academic publishing is evolving and our current system of correcting research post-publication is fa...
Extensive revising is required by most sociology journals. It is normative for authors to "revise an...
Extensive revising is required by most sociology journals. It is normative for authors to "revise an...
Seriously—PLEASE! Journals want us to revise and resubmit papers that are rejected because it benefi...
In our last editorial (2018, v. 2) we addressed the desk review (DR) process, the first challenge fo...
Experienced authors are familiar with the traditional types of letters from journal editors. accept,...
Summary: - Scientists can correct and retract their work for a variety of sound reasons, not just d...
Summary: - Scientists can correct and retract their work for a variety of sound reasons, not just d...
I have read the article "Retract or be damned: a dangerous moment for science and the public" by Kam...
I have read the article "Retract or be damned: a dangerous moment for science and the public" by Kam...
I have read the article "Retract or be damned: a dangerous moment for science and the public" by Kam...
I have read the article "Retract or be damned: a dangerous moment for science and the public" by Kam...
While it seems obvious that withdrawing papers, which contain errors or misconduct, helps to keep th...
While it seems obvious that withdrawing papers, which contain errors or misconduct, helps to keep th...
While it seems obvious that withdrawing papers, which contain errors or misconduct, helps to keep th...
Academic publishing is evolving and our current system of correcting research post-publication is fa...
Extensive revising is required by most sociology journals. It is normative for authors to "revise an...
Extensive revising is required by most sociology journals. It is normative for authors to "revise an...
Seriously—PLEASE! Journals want us to revise and resubmit papers that are rejected because it benefi...
In our last editorial (2018, v. 2) we addressed the desk review (DR) process, the first challenge fo...
Experienced authors are familiar with the traditional types of letters from journal editors. accept,...
Summary: - Scientists can correct and retract their work for a variety of sound reasons, not just d...
Summary: - Scientists can correct and retract their work for a variety of sound reasons, not just d...
I have read the article "Retract or be damned: a dangerous moment for science and the public" by Kam...
I have read the article "Retract or be damned: a dangerous moment for science and the public" by Kam...
I have read the article "Retract or be damned: a dangerous moment for science and the public" by Kam...
I have read the article "Retract or be damned: a dangerous moment for science and the public" by Kam...
While it seems obvious that withdrawing papers, which contain errors or misconduct, helps to keep th...
While it seems obvious that withdrawing papers, which contain errors or misconduct, helps to keep th...
While it seems obvious that withdrawing papers, which contain errors or misconduct, helps to keep th...
Academic publishing is evolving and our current system of correcting research post-publication is fa...