In their publication entitled 1900: Hoogtij van burgerlijke cultuur, the authors, Jan Bank and Maarten van Buuren, failed to pay adequate attention to the contrasts and differences that typified Dutch culture at the fin de siècle. The book therefore lacks analytical precision. The term 'bourgeois culture' should not have been applied in such an all-inclusive and unambiguous manner. This review is part of the discussion forum IJkpunt 1900
'1800. Blueprints for a society' argues the case for the primacy of culture in late 18th-century Dut...
It is highly regrettable that a history of the Netherlands seen from five focal points starts with t...
Douwe Fokkema, Frans Grijzenhout The authors take issue with the critical remarks that were levelled...
In their publication entitled 1900: Hoogtij van burgerlijke cultuur, the authors, Jan Bank and Maart...
Bank and Van Buuren erroneously state that 1900 was the year in which bourgeois culture reached its ...
Recensie van: Jan Bank en Maarten van Buuren, 1900. Hoogtij van burgerlijke cultuurIn their publicat...
Recensie van: Jan Bank en Maarten van Buuren, 1900. Hoogtij van burgerlijke cultuurIn their publicat...
Recensie van: Jan Bank en Maarten van Buuren, 1900. Hoogtij van burgerlijke cultuurIn their publicat...
In this essay I express my greatest admiration for Mijnhardt's and Kloek's Blauwdrukken. Not only do...
In this essay I express my greatest admiration for Mijnhardt's and Kloek's Blauwdrukken. Not only do...
In his rich book Plaatsen van beschaafd vertier (Places of civilised pleasure) Jan Hein Furnée displ...
In his rich book Plaatsen van beschaafd vertier (Places of civilised pleasure) Jan Hein Furnée displ...
In '1800 a reply' the various reviews of Blauwdrukken vooreen samenleving [Blueprints for living tog...
In their rejoinder, the authors of 1650: Bevochten eendracht discuss the main criticisms brought for...
'1800. Blueprints for a society' argues the case for the primacy of culture in late 18th-century Dut...
'1800. Blueprints for a society' argues the case for the primacy of culture in late 18th-century Dut...
It is highly regrettable that a history of the Netherlands seen from five focal points starts with t...
Douwe Fokkema, Frans Grijzenhout The authors take issue with the critical remarks that were levelled...
In their publication entitled 1900: Hoogtij van burgerlijke cultuur, the authors, Jan Bank and Maart...
Bank and Van Buuren erroneously state that 1900 was the year in which bourgeois culture reached its ...
Recensie van: Jan Bank en Maarten van Buuren, 1900. Hoogtij van burgerlijke cultuurIn their publicat...
Recensie van: Jan Bank en Maarten van Buuren, 1900. Hoogtij van burgerlijke cultuurIn their publicat...
Recensie van: Jan Bank en Maarten van Buuren, 1900. Hoogtij van burgerlijke cultuurIn their publicat...
In this essay I express my greatest admiration for Mijnhardt's and Kloek's Blauwdrukken. Not only do...
In this essay I express my greatest admiration for Mijnhardt's and Kloek's Blauwdrukken. Not only do...
In his rich book Plaatsen van beschaafd vertier (Places of civilised pleasure) Jan Hein Furnée displ...
In his rich book Plaatsen van beschaafd vertier (Places of civilised pleasure) Jan Hein Furnée displ...
In '1800 a reply' the various reviews of Blauwdrukken vooreen samenleving [Blueprints for living tog...
In their rejoinder, the authors of 1650: Bevochten eendracht discuss the main criticisms brought for...
'1800. Blueprints for a society' argues the case for the primacy of culture in late 18th-century Dut...
'1800. Blueprints for a society' argues the case for the primacy of culture in late 18th-century Dut...
It is highly regrettable that a history of the Netherlands seen from five focal points starts with t...
Douwe Fokkema, Frans Grijzenhout The authors take issue with the critical remarks that were levelled...