Purpose – The publication oeuvre of a researcher carries great value when academic careers are assessed, and being recognised as a successful candidate is usually equated with being a productive author. Yet, howpublications are valued in the context of evaluating careers is so far an understudied topic. The paper aims to discuss these issues. Design/methodology/approach – Through a content analysis of assessment reports in three disciplines – biomedicine, economics and history – this paper analyses how externalities are used to evaluate publication oeuvres. Externalities are defined as features such as reviews and bibliometric indicators, which can be assessed without evaluating the epistemological claims made in the actual text. Findings –...
International audienceBorn in the seventeenth century, journal peer review is an extremely diverse t...
demic science, with publications being a fundamental metric. Many aspects of the evaluation process ...
This paper is a contribution to the debate in Italy about the evaluation of scholarly research and t...
The assessment of scientific publications is an integral part of the scientific process. Here we inv...
The assessment of scientific publications is an integral part of the scientific process. Here we inv...
<div><p>The assessment of scientific publications is an integral part of the scientific process. Her...
A researcher's number of publications has been a fundamental merit in the competition for academic p...
Background: The assessment of scientific publications is an integral part of the scientific process....
A researcher’s number of publications has been a fundamental merit in the competition for academic p...
Evaluation of scientific work underlies the process of career advancement in academic science, with ...
Scientific achievement by publishing a scientific manuscript in a peer reviewed biomedical journal i...
This briefing paper aims to provide a historical perspective that can inform the debates about what ...
Production of scientific work is regulated by reward systems. Scientists are typically rewarded for ...
Academics are under increasing pressure to demonstrate the impact of their research with external ac...
In order to enhance the accountability and legitimacy of public research, performance-based research...
International audienceBorn in the seventeenth century, journal peer review is an extremely diverse t...
demic science, with publications being a fundamental metric. Many aspects of the evaluation process ...
This paper is a contribution to the debate in Italy about the evaluation of scholarly research and t...
The assessment of scientific publications is an integral part of the scientific process. Here we inv...
The assessment of scientific publications is an integral part of the scientific process. Here we inv...
<div><p>The assessment of scientific publications is an integral part of the scientific process. Her...
A researcher's number of publications has been a fundamental merit in the competition for academic p...
Background: The assessment of scientific publications is an integral part of the scientific process....
A researcher’s number of publications has been a fundamental merit in the competition for academic p...
Evaluation of scientific work underlies the process of career advancement in academic science, with ...
Scientific achievement by publishing a scientific manuscript in a peer reviewed biomedical journal i...
This briefing paper aims to provide a historical perspective that can inform the debates about what ...
Production of scientific work is regulated by reward systems. Scientists are typically rewarded for ...
Academics are under increasing pressure to demonstrate the impact of their research with external ac...
In order to enhance the accountability and legitimacy of public research, performance-based research...
International audienceBorn in the seventeenth century, journal peer review is an extremely diverse t...
demic science, with publications being a fundamental metric. Many aspects of the evaluation process ...
This paper is a contribution to the debate in Italy about the evaluation of scholarly research and t...