This article is forthcoming in Philosophical Books.Mark Kalderon has defended an interesting form of moral fictionalism in his 2005 book. In this paper I challenge his view by pressing a dilemma stemming from the question of what the fictionalist should say is expressed by acts of making an ethical claim. On one horn of the dilemma, they express attitudes of pretense; on the other horn of the dilemma, they express desire-like mental states. I argue that the first-horn is not plausible on phenomenological grounds. I argue that the second horn is not clearly an improvement over contemporary quasi-realist versions of expressivism
This paper is forthcoming in Philosophy and Phenomenological ResearchThe realism-irrealism debate in...
Explores the consequences of the discovery, if it is one, that morality is a fiction. Book chapter
Moral fictionalism is the view that everyday moral judgments involve, or else ought to involve, a so...
One major problem with moral discourse is that we tend treat moral utterances as if they represent p...
One advantage of a fictionalist noncognitivism is that is not subject to the same semantic difficult...
There is a long-standing discussion concerning the nature of moral discourse. Multiple views range f...
Realistic Fictionalism, argues for two main claims: First, that there is no conceptual or logical in...
In this paper we introduce a distinct metaethical position, fictionalism about morality. We clarify ...
In this paper we introduce a distinct metaethical position, fictionalism about morality. We clarify ...
Alarmed by the growing intransigence of public moral discussion, I undertook to describe in Moral Fi...
Fictionalists propose that some apparently fact-stating discourses do not aim to convey factual info...
Fictionalism has made a comeback over the last two decades as one of the standard responses to ontol...
There is a debate among moral error theorists. It concerns what is to be done with moral discourse o...
Fictionalists claim that instead of believing certain controversial propositions they accept them no...
The paper develops an attack on quasi-realism in ethics, according to which expressivism about ethic...
This paper is forthcoming in Philosophy and Phenomenological ResearchThe realism-irrealism debate in...
Explores the consequences of the discovery, if it is one, that morality is a fiction. Book chapter
Moral fictionalism is the view that everyday moral judgments involve, or else ought to involve, a so...
One major problem with moral discourse is that we tend treat moral utterances as if they represent p...
One advantage of a fictionalist noncognitivism is that is not subject to the same semantic difficult...
There is a long-standing discussion concerning the nature of moral discourse. Multiple views range f...
Realistic Fictionalism, argues for two main claims: First, that there is no conceptual or logical in...
In this paper we introduce a distinct metaethical position, fictionalism about morality. We clarify ...
In this paper we introduce a distinct metaethical position, fictionalism about morality. We clarify ...
Alarmed by the growing intransigence of public moral discussion, I undertook to describe in Moral Fi...
Fictionalists propose that some apparently fact-stating discourses do not aim to convey factual info...
Fictionalism has made a comeback over the last two decades as one of the standard responses to ontol...
There is a debate among moral error theorists. It concerns what is to be done with moral discourse o...
Fictionalists claim that instead of believing certain controversial propositions they accept them no...
The paper develops an attack on quasi-realism in ethics, according to which expressivism about ethic...
This paper is forthcoming in Philosophy and Phenomenological ResearchThe realism-irrealism debate in...
Explores the consequences of the discovery, if it is one, that morality is a fiction. Book chapter
Moral fictionalism is the view that everyday moral judgments involve, or else ought to involve, a so...