Nearly four decades ago, the Supreme Court of Missouri issued an opinion that continues to generate confusion on what constitutes a joint venture. Johnson v. Pacific Intermountain Express Co. not only distorted the elements required to establish a joint venture but also provided for the business organization’s wrongful creation by operation of law through implication.1 Upon this shaky foundation, corporate law jurisprudence in Missouri has grappled for decades with the same essential questions of what constitutes a joint venture and how this species of partnership may come into existence
It has been “a matter of considerable dispute” whether partnership legislation should treat a genera...
Part I of this Comment defines the cooperative venture rule and the plain meaning rule as they are u...
This Summary examines how this inconsistency of law came to be, the public policy arguments for and ...
Nearly four decades ago, the Supreme Court of Missouri issued an opinion that continues to generate ...
American industry employs many forms of business organizations. The sole proprietorship, the partner...
[Extract] Judicial recognition: The term 'joint venture' is not a technical one with a settled commo...
Revised, definitive versions of this paper have been published subsequently as: Chetwin, M. (2008...
In the U.S., the general partnership has been characterized as the default form of co-owned and for-...
When one party is encumbered with a liability, it will often look for another party to assume some o...
Antitrust courts and commentators have long appreciated that joint ventures among rival firms have t...
Every business firm that is created must be categorized as some type of entity from the moment it be...
Infinite variety is possible in the agreements by which persons unite property or services in the ho...
In the American Needle case the Supreme Court will consider whether the NFL’s decision to give an ex...
It has been “a matter of considerable dispute” whether partnership legislation should treat a genera...
Action in assumpsit for money due under a contract whereby defendant leased plaintiff\u27s entire cl...
It has been “a matter of considerable dispute” whether partnership legislation should treat a genera...
Part I of this Comment defines the cooperative venture rule and the plain meaning rule as they are u...
This Summary examines how this inconsistency of law came to be, the public policy arguments for and ...
Nearly four decades ago, the Supreme Court of Missouri issued an opinion that continues to generate ...
American industry employs many forms of business organizations. The sole proprietorship, the partner...
[Extract] Judicial recognition: The term 'joint venture' is not a technical one with a settled commo...
Revised, definitive versions of this paper have been published subsequently as: Chetwin, M. (2008...
In the U.S., the general partnership has been characterized as the default form of co-owned and for-...
When one party is encumbered with a liability, it will often look for another party to assume some o...
Antitrust courts and commentators have long appreciated that joint ventures among rival firms have t...
Every business firm that is created must be categorized as some type of entity from the moment it be...
Infinite variety is possible in the agreements by which persons unite property or services in the ho...
In the American Needle case the Supreme Court will consider whether the NFL’s decision to give an ex...
It has been “a matter of considerable dispute” whether partnership legislation should treat a genera...
Action in assumpsit for money due under a contract whereby defendant leased plaintiff\u27s entire cl...
It has been “a matter of considerable dispute” whether partnership legislation should treat a genera...
Part I of this Comment defines the cooperative venture rule and the plain meaning rule as they are u...
This Summary examines how this inconsistency of law came to be, the public policy arguments for and ...