Add to ORKGThis paper reviews the U.S. Supreme Court’s opinion in Bostock v. Clayton County. There, the Court held that by barring employer discrimination against any individual “because of such individual’s . . . sex,” Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 also bars employment discrimination because an individual is gay or transgender. The paper then speculates about how much Bostock will affect how likely lower court judges will read other “sex” discrimination prohibitions in the U.S. Code in the same way, in part based on a canvass of the text of about 150 of those prohibitions. The paper also discusses the religion-based defenses that defendants may raise in response under Title VII itself, the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, and the First ...
42 U.S.C. § 1985(3) is a Reconstruction-era statute that allows one to recover damages from those th...
On July 18, 2018, the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals held, in Bostock v. Clayton County Board of ...
In Bostock v. Clayton County, one of the blockbuster cases from its 2019 Term, the Supreme Court hel...
On June 15, 2020, the Supreme Court of the United States announced its opinion in the landmark case ...
In October of 2019, the Supreme Court heard the arguments of two cases presenting the same inquiry: ...
n June 2020, the Supreme Court decided Bostock v. Clayton County. In Bostock, the Court held that di...
orientation and gender identity was cheered by LGBTQ people and allies. Indeed, the June 15 decision...
In Bostock v. Clayton County the Supreme Court held that the Title VII ban on employment discriminat...
The Supreme Court’s opinion in Bostock v. Clayton County, Georgia—recognizing that anti-gay and anti...
LGBT rights in the United States have come a long way in the past few decades. Cases such as Lawrenc...
In 2020, the Court held in Bostock v. Clayton County that discrimination on the basis of sexual orie...
The recent U.S. Supreme Court ruling in Bostock v. Clayton County is a landmark piece of case law th...
Bostock held that Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964\u27s proscription against sex discrimina...
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 protects employees from workplace discrimination and haras...
In Bostock v. Clayton County, one of the blockbuster cases from its 2019 Term, the Supreme Court hel...
42 U.S.C. § 1985(3) is a Reconstruction-era statute that allows one to recover damages from those th...
On July 18, 2018, the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals held, in Bostock v. Clayton County Board of ...
In Bostock v. Clayton County, one of the blockbuster cases from its 2019 Term, the Supreme Court hel...
On June 15, 2020, the Supreme Court of the United States announced its opinion in the landmark case ...
In October of 2019, the Supreme Court heard the arguments of two cases presenting the same inquiry: ...
n June 2020, the Supreme Court decided Bostock v. Clayton County. In Bostock, the Court held that di...
orientation and gender identity was cheered by LGBTQ people and allies. Indeed, the June 15 decision...
In Bostock v. Clayton County the Supreme Court held that the Title VII ban on employment discriminat...
The Supreme Court’s opinion in Bostock v. Clayton County, Georgia—recognizing that anti-gay and anti...
LGBT rights in the United States have come a long way in the past few decades. Cases such as Lawrenc...
In 2020, the Court held in Bostock v. Clayton County that discrimination on the basis of sexual orie...
The recent U.S. Supreme Court ruling in Bostock v. Clayton County is a landmark piece of case law th...
Bostock held that Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964\u27s proscription against sex discrimina...
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 protects employees from workplace discrimination and haras...
In Bostock v. Clayton County, one of the blockbuster cases from its 2019 Term, the Supreme Court hel...
42 U.S.C. § 1985(3) is a Reconstruction-era statute that allows one to recover damages from those th...
On July 18, 2018, the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals held, in Bostock v. Clayton County Board of ...
In Bostock v. Clayton County, one of the blockbuster cases from its 2019 Term, the Supreme Court hel...