Correcting mistakes in light of new data and updating findings to reflect this is often considered to be a key characteristic of scientific research. Commenting on the ‘Loss-of-Confidence Project’, a study into self-correction amongst psychologists, Julia M. Rohrer, suggests that in practice self-correction of published research is, infrequent, difficult to achieve and perceived to come with reputational costs. However, by reframing and changing the static nature of academic publications, it may be possible to develop a research culture more conducive to self-correction
The impact of academic research, particularly on policy and the private sector, is an increasingly i...
Outside of specific institutional and organizational settings discussions about ‘impact’ often desce...
In this paper, I investigate the nature of empirical findings that provide evidence for the characte...
Many trans researchers change their name to match their gender identity. However, there is currently...
A recent study has revealed widespread unethical behaviour in academic research. Allen Wilhite focus...
Only a small fraction of research misconduct ever comes to light. Independent investigative bodies c...
Van Witteloostuijn’s (2016) commentary “What happened to Popperian Falsification?” is an excellent s...
This is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from Emerald via the DOI in t...
It has become increasingly clear that prevailing academic incentive structures have a potentially da...
Data sharing is a key principle of open science, and research funders are increasingly including thi...
The recent announcement by the U.S. Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) set out a require...
Failure is an inevitable part of any academic career. This may feel especially true for those resear...
The negative consequences of relying too heavily on metrics to assess research quality are well know...
Academics looking to communicate the findings and value of their research to wider audiences are inc...
The literature review is a staple of the scholarly article. It allows authors to summarise previous ...
The impact of academic research, particularly on policy and the private sector, is an increasingly i...
Outside of specific institutional and organizational settings discussions about ‘impact’ often desce...
In this paper, I investigate the nature of empirical findings that provide evidence for the characte...
Many trans researchers change their name to match their gender identity. However, there is currently...
A recent study has revealed widespread unethical behaviour in academic research. Allen Wilhite focus...
Only a small fraction of research misconduct ever comes to light. Independent investigative bodies c...
Van Witteloostuijn’s (2016) commentary “What happened to Popperian Falsification?” is an excellent s...
This is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from Emerald via the DOI in t...
It has become increasingly clear that prevailing academic incentive structures have a potentially da...
Data sharing is a key principle of open science, and research funders are increasingly including thi...
The recent announcement by the U.S. Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) set out a require...
Failure is an inevitable part of any academic career. This may feel especially true for those resear...
The negative consequences of relying too heavily on metrics to assess research quality are well know...
Academics looking to communicate the findings and value of their research to wider audiences are inc...
The literature review is a staple of the scholarly article. It allows authors to summarise previous ...
The impact of academic research, particularly on policy and the private sector, is an increasingly i...
Outside of specific institutional and organizational settings discussions about ‘impact’ often desce...
In this paper, I investigate the nature of empirical findings that provide evidence for the characte...