Separation and identification of microplastics from primary and secondary effluents and activated sludge from wastewater treatment plants

[EN] Although wastewater treatment plants can retain a high percentage of microplastics (MP) arriving at the facilities, no method for extracting and characterizing these microparticles has been still standardized in these units. This study investigated three protocols of chemical digestion, prior to analysis of microplastics, one directed to the effluents, using peroxidation, and two for activated sludge (peroxidation and Fenton). The samples (primary effluent, secondary effluent and activated sludge) were collected from a wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) located in Valencia (Spain). In addition, four common types of polymers (Low density polyethylene-LDPE, Polypropylene-PP, Polystyrene-PS and Polyethylene terephthalate-PET) were used to assess the influence of reagent exposure on microparticle integrity. Peroxidation was effective in treating the studied effluents (primary and secondary) and was also identified as the ideal protocol for activated sludge. The analysis showed that the use of H2O2 does not compromise the identification of the polymers evaluated by FTIR and also significantly reduced the concentration of suspended solids, resulting in an efficient visual separation of the microparticles. After been properly separated, the microparticles were characterized according to their size, colour and shape, and a fraction submitted to identification by mu-ATR-FTIR/ATR-FTIR. In all samples, a high presence of microfibers (MF) was observed, corresponding to more than 90% of the microparticles. However, in relation to secondary effluents, only 9% of these MF were identified as plastics, the remaining ones corresponded to cotton. The fragments found in the samples were classified as secondary in origin, and were mainly PE and PP, lower than 1 mm size.Authors thank the Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities for the financial support (Reference of the project: RTI2018-096916-B-I00).Alvim, CB.; Bes-Piá, M.; Mendoza Roca, JA. (2020). Separation and identification of microplastics from primary and secondary effluents and activated sludge from wastewater treatment plants. Chemical Engineering Journal. 402:1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2020.126293110402PlasticsEurope, Plastics – the Facts, Plast. – Facts 2018. (2018) 38. https://www.plasticseurope.org/application/files/6315/4510/9658/Plastics_the_facts_2018_AF_web.pdf (accessed 02 Septiembre 2019).Auta, H. S., Emenike, C. ., & Fauziah, S. . (2017). Distribution and importance of microplastics in the marine environment: A review of the sources, fate, effects, and potential solutions. Environment International, 102, 165-176. doi:10.1016/j.envint.2017.02.013Carr, S. A., Liu, J., & Tesoro, A. G. (2016). Transport and fate of microplastic particles in wastewater treatment plants. Water Research, 91, 174-182. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2016.01.002Li, J., Liu, H., & Paul Chen, J. (2018). Microplastics in freshwater systems: A review on occurrence, environmental effects, and methods for microplastics detection. Water Research, 137, 362-374. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2017.12.056Fendall, L. S., & Sewell, M. A. (2009). Contributing to marine pollution by washing your face: Microplastics in facial cleansers. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 58(8), 1225-1228. doi:10.1016/j.marpolbul.2009.04.025Guerranti, C., Martellini, T., Perra, G., Scopetani, C., & Cincinelli, A. (2019). Microplastics in cosmetics: Environmental issues and needs for global bans. Environmental Toxicology and Pharmacology, 68, 75-79. doi:10.1016/j.etap.2019.03.007Napper, I. E., Bakir, A., Rowland, S. J., & Thompson, R. C. (2015). Characterisation, quantity and sorptive properties of microplastics extracted from cosmetics. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 99(1-2), 178-185. doi:10.1016/j.marpolbul.2015.07.029Gies, E. A., LeNoble, J. L., Noël, M., Etemadifar, A., Bishay, F., Hall, E. R., & Ross, P. S. (2018). Retention of microplastics in a major secondary wastewater treatment plant in Vancouver, Canada. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 133, 553-561. doi:10.1016/j.marpolbul.2018.06.006Michielssen, M. R., Michielssen, E. R., Ni, J., & Duhaime, M. B. (2016). Fate of microplastics and other small anthropogenic litter (SAL) in wastewater treatment plants depends on unit processes employed. Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology, 2(6), 1064-1073. doi:10.1039/c6ew00207bGündoğdu, S., Çevik, C., Güzel, E., & Kilercioğlu, S. (2018). Microplastics in municipal wastewater treatment plants in Turkey: a comparison of the influent and secondary effluent concentrations. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 190(11). doi:10.1007/s10661-018-7010-yMason, S. A., Garneau, D., Sutton, R., Chu, Y., Ehmann, K., Barnes, J., … Rogers, D. L. (2016). Microplastic pollution is widely detected in US municipal wastewater treatment plant effluent. Environmental Pollution, 218, 1045-1054. doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2016.08.056Ziajahromi, S., Neale, P. A., Rintoul, L., & Leusch, F. D. L. (2017). Wastewater treatment plants as a pathway for microplastics: Development of a new approach to sample wastewater-based microplastics. Water Research, 112, 93-99. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2017.01.042He, D., Luo, Y., Lu, S., Liu, M., Song, Y., & Lei, L. (2018). Microplastics in soils: Analytical methods, pollution characteristics and ecological risks. TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry, 109, 163-172. doi:10.1016/j.trac.2018.10.006Murphy, F., Ewins, C., Carbonnier, F., & Quinn, B. (2016). Wastewater Treatment Works (WwTW) as a Source of Microplastics in the Aquatic Environment. Environmental Science & Technology, 50(11), 5800-5808. doi:10.1021/acs.est.5b05416Plastics - the Facts 2019, (2019). https://www.plasticseurope.org/en/resources/market-data. (accessed 30 January 2020).Munno, K., Helm, P. A., Jackson, D. A., Rochman, C., & Sims, A. (2017). Impacts of temperature and selected chemical digestion methods on microplastic particles. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 37(1), 91-98. doi:10.1002/etc.3935Lee, H., & Kim, Y. (2018). Treatment characteristics of microplastics at biological sewage treatment facilities in Korea. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 137, 1-8. doi:10.1016/j.marpolbul.2018.09.050Lares, M., Ncibi, M. C., Sillanpää, M., & Sillanpää, M. (2018). Occurrence, identification and removal of microplastic particles and fibers in conventional activated sludge process and advanced MBR technology. Water Research, 133, 236-246. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2018.01.049Bretas Alvim, C., Mendoza-Roca, J. A., & Bes-Piá, A. (2020). Wastewater treatment plant as microplastics release source – Quantification and identification techniques. Journal of Environmental Management, 255, 109739. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109739Tagg, A. S., Sapp, M., Harrison, J. P., & Ojeda, J. J. (2015). Identification and Quantification of Microplastics in Wastewater Using Focal Plane Array-Based Reflectance Micro-FT-IR Imaging. Analytical Chemistry, 87(12), 6032-6040. doi:10.1021/acs.analchem.5b00495Tagg, A. S., Harrison, J. P., Ju-Nam, Y., Sapp, M., Bradley, E. L., Sinclair, C. J., & Ojeda, J. J. (2017). Fenton’s reagent for the rapid and efficient isolation of microplastics from wastewater. Chemical Communications, 53(2), 372-375. doi:10.1039/c6cc08798aHidalgo-Ruz, V., Gutow, L., Thompson, R. C., & Thiel, M. (2012). Microplastics in the Marine Environment: A Review of the Methods Used for Identification and Quantification. Environmental Science & Technology, 46(6), 3060-3075. doi:10.1021/es2031505Hidayaturrahman, H., & Lee, T.-G. (2019). A study on characteristics of microplastic in wastewater of South Korea: Identification, quantification, and fate of microplastics during treatment process. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 146, 696-702. doi:10.1016/j.marpolbul.2019.06.071Talvitie, J., Heinonen, M., Pääkkönen, J.-P., Vahtera, E., Mikola, A., Setälä, O., & Vahala, R. (2015). Do wastewater treatment plants act as a potential point source of microplastics? Preliminary study in the coastal Gulf of Finland, Baltic Sea. Water Science and Technology, 72(9), 1495-1504. doi:10.2166/wst.2015.360Peets, P., Leito, I., Pelt, J., & Vahur, S. (2017). Identification and classification of textile fibres using ATR-FT-IR spectroscopy with chemometric methods. Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy, 173, 175-181. doi:10.1016/j.saa.2016.09.007E. Andreassen, Infrared and Raman spectroscopy of polypropylene, (1999) 320–328. DOI:10.1007/978-94-011-4421-6_46.Tang, C.-C., Chen, H.-I., Brimblecombe, P., & Lee, C.-L. (2019). Morphology and chemical properties of polypropylene pellets degraded in simulated terrestrial and marine environments. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 149, 110626. doi:10.1016/j.marpolbul.2019.110626Xiong, J., Liao, X., Zhu, J., An, Z., Yang, Q., Huang, Y., & Li, G. (2017). Natural weathering mechanism of isotatic polypropylene under different outdoor climates in China. Polymer Degradation and Stability, 146, 212-222. doi:10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2017.10.012Hurley, R. R., Lusher, A. L., Olsen, M., & Nizzetto, L. (2018). Validation of a Method for Extracting Microplastics from Complex, Organic-Rich, Environmental Matrices. Environmental Science & Technology, 52(13), 7409-7417. doi:10.1021/acs.est.8b01517Zhang, M., Dong, H., Zhao, L., Wang, D., & Meng, D. (2019). A review on Fenton process for organic wastewater treatment based on optimization perspective. Science of The Total Environment, 670, 110-121. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.03.180BADAWY, M., & ALI, M. (2006). Fenton’s peroxidation and coagulation processes for the treatment of combined industrial and domestic wastewater. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 136(3), 961-966. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.01.042Kang, S.-F., Liao, C.-H., & Chen, M.-C. (2002). Pre-oxidation and coagulation of textile wastewater by the Fenton process. Chemosphere, 46(6), 923-928. doi:10.1016/s0045-6535(01)00159-xAmudha, V., Kavitha, S., Fernandez, C., Adishkumar, S., & Banu, J. R. (2016). Effect of deflocculation on the efficiency of sludge reduction by Fenton process. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 23(19), 19281-19291. doi:10.1007/s11356-016-7118-yEdo, C., González-Pleiter, M., Leganés, F., Fernández-Piñas, F., & Rosal, R. (2020). Fate of microplastics in wastewater treatment plants and their environmental dispersion with effluent and sludge. Environmental Pollution, 259, 113837. doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2019.113837Magni, S., Binelli, A., Pittura, L., Avio, C. G., Della Torre, C., Parenti, C. C., … Regoli, F. (2019). The fate of microplastics in an Italian Wastewater Treatment Plant. Science of The Total Environment, 652, 602-610. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.269Liu, X., Yuan, W., Di, M., Li, Z., & Wang, J. (2019). Transfer and fate of microplastics during the conventional activated sludge process in one wastewater treatment plant of China. Chemical Engineering Journal, 362, 176-182. doi:10.1016/j.cej.2019.01.033Kalčíková, G., Alič, B., Skalar, T., Bundschuh, M., & Gotvajn, A. Ž. (2017). Wastewater treatment plant effluents as source of cosmetic polyethylene microbeads to freshwater. Chemosphere, 188, 25-31. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.08.131Andrady, A. L. (2011). Microplastics in the marine environment. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 62(8), 1596-1605. doi:10.1016/j.marpolbul.2011.05.030Zettler, E. R., Mincer, T. J., & Amaral-Zettler, L. A. (2013). Life in the «Plastisphere»: Microbial Communities on Plastic Marine Debris. Environmental Science & Technology, 47(13), 7137-7146. doi:10.1021/es401288xLiu, M., Lu, S., Song, Y., Lei, L., Hu, J., Lv, W., … He, D. (2018). Microplastic and mesoplastic pollution in farmland soils in suburbs of Shanghai, China. Environmental Pollution, 242, 855-862. doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2018.07.051Bouwmeester, H., Hollman, P. C. H., & Peters, R. J. B. (2015). Potential Health Impact of Environmentally Released Micro- and Nanoplastics in the Human Food Production Chain: Experiences from Nanotoxicology. Environmental Science & Technology, 49(15), 8932-8947. doi:10.1021/acs.est.5b01090Leslie, H. A., Brandsma, S. H., van Velzen, M. J. M., & Vethaak, A. D. (2017). Microplastics en route: Field measurements in the Dutch river delta and Amsterdam canals, wastewater treatment plants, North Sea sediments and biota. Environment International, 101, 133-142. doi:10.1016/j.envint.2017.01.018Sutton, R., Mason, S. A., Stanek, S. K., Willis-Norton, E., Wren, I. F., & Box, C. (2016). Microplastic contamination in the San Francisco Bay, California, USA. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 109(1), 230-235. doi:10.1016/j.marpolbul.2016.05.077Yang, L., Li, K., Cui, S., Kang, Y., An, L., & Lei, K. (2019). Removal of microplastics in municipal sewage from China’s largest water reclamation plant. Water Research, 155, 175-181. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2019.02.046Browne, M. A., Crump, P., Niven, S. J., Teuten, E., Tonkin, A., Galloway, T., & Thompson, R. (2011). Accumulation of Microplastic on Shorelines Woldwide: Sources and Sinks. Environmental Science & Technology, 45(21), 9175-9179. doi:10.1021/es201811sCarney Almroth, B. M., Åström, L., Roslund, S., Petersson, H., Johansson, M., & Persson, N.-K. (2017). Quantifying shedding of synthetic fibers from textiles; a source of microplastics released into the environment. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 25(2), 1191-1199. doi:10.1007/s11356-017-0528-7Remy, F., Collard, F., Gilbert, B., Compère, P., Eppe, G., & Lepoint, G. (2015). When Microplastic Is Not Plastic: The Ingestion of Artificial Cellulose Fibers by Macrofauna Living in Seagrass Macrophytodetritus. Environmental Science & Technology, 49(18), 11158-11166. doi:10.1021/acs.est.5b02005Ladewig, S. M., Bao, S., & Chow, A. T. (2015). Natural Fibers: A Missing Link to Chemical Pollution Dispersion in Aquatic Environments. Environmental Science & Technology, 49(21), 12609-12610. doi:10.1021/acs.est.5b04754Talvitie, J., Mikola, A., Setälä, O., Heinonen, M., & Koistinen, A. (2017). How well is microlitter purified from wastewater? – A detailed study on the stepwise removal of microlitter in a tertiary level wastewater treatment plant. Water Research, 109, 164-172. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2016.11.046Bayo, J., Olmos, S., & López-Castellanos, J. (2020). Microplastics in an urban wastewater treatment plant: The influence of physicochemical parameters and environmental factors. Chemosphere, 238, 124593. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.12459