Development of advanced materials guided by numerical simulations to improve performance and cost-efficiency of borehole heat exchangers (BHEs)

[EN] One promising way to improve the efficiency of borehole heat exchangers (BHEs) in shallow geothermal applications is to enhance the thermal properties of the materials involved in its construction. Early attempts, such as using metal tubes in the 1980s or the utilization of thin-foil hoses, did not succeed in being adopted by the market for diverse reasons (cost, corrosion, fragility, etc...). In parallel, the optimization of pipe size, the use of double-U-tubes, thermally enhanced grout, etc. were able to bring the measure for the BHE efficiency, the borehole thermal resistance, from 0.20 to 0.15 K/(Wm) down to 0.08-0.06 K/(Wm) in the best solutions today. A further improvement cannot be expected without development of new, dedicated materials, combining the versatility of plastic like PE with an increased thermal conductivity that matches the respective properties of the rock and soil. This goal was included in the Strategic Research and Innovation Agenda of the European Technology Platform on Renewable Heating and Cooling in 2013. Within an EU supported project, both BHE pipes and grouting materials have been produced prototypically in small amounts, suitable for the first tests in the intended environment. The present work explains the research pathways envisaged and the resulting sensitivity analysis to highlight the influence of some of the most critical parameters that affect the overall performance of a GSHP system. The results have allowed guiding the real development of more efficient new advanced materials for different scenarios representative of different European regions. Finally the developed materials and their properties are discussed, including a comparative assessment about their compliance with reference material properties as currently seen in the BHE market.This article is part of a project that has received funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 727583.Badenes Badenes, B.; Sanner, B.; Mateo Pla, MÁ.; Cuevas, JM.; Bartoli, F.; Ciardelli, F.; González, RM.... (2020). Development of advanced materials guided by numerical simulations to improve performance and cost-efficiency of borehole heat exchangers (BHEs). Energy. 201:1-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.117628117201Alva, G., Lin, Y., & Fang, G. (2018). An overview of thermal energy storage systems. Energy, 144, 341-378. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2017.12.037Li, H., Xu, W., Yu, Z., Wu, J., & Sun, Z. (2017). Application analyze of a ground source heat pump system in a nearly zero energy building in China. Energy, 125, 140-151. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2017.02.108Ozgener, O. (2010). Use of solar assisted geothermal heat pump and small wind turbine systems for heating agricultural and residential buildings. Energy, 35(1), 262-268. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2009.09.018Jensen, J. K., Ommen, T., Markussen, W. B., & Elmegaard, B. (2017). Design of serially connected district heating heat pumps utilising a geothermal heat source. Energy, 137, 865-877. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2017.03.164A. C. Crandall, House heating with earth heat pump, Electr World, 126/19, 94-5 (1946).Moegle, E. (2009). Earth- and buildingsided characteristics of a geothermal energy field with five coaxial tubes erected in 1974 in Schoenaich (County of Boeblingen) – a contribution to history for near-surface geothermic drilling in Europe. Jahresberichte und Mitteilungen des Oberrheinischen Geologischen Vereins, 91, 31-35. doi:10.1127/jmogv/91/2009/31Lundh, M., & Dalenbäck, J.-O. (2008). Swedish solar heated residential area with seasonal storage in rock: Initial evaluation. Renewable Energy, 33(4), 703-711. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2007.03.024Ground coupled heat pumps of high technology - groundhit, Funded by FP6-SUSTDEV - sustainable development, global change and ecosystems: thematic priority 6 under the focusing and integrating community research programme 2002-2006. Project ID: 503063.Go, G.-H., Lee, S.-R., Yoon, S., Park, H., & Park, Sk. (2014). Estimation and experimental validation of borehole thermal resistance. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 18(4), 992-1000. doi:10.1007/s12205-014-0454-xZhang, S., Huang, Z., Li, G., Wu, X., Peng, C., & Zhang, W. (2018). Numerical analysis of transient conjugate heat transfer and thermal stress distribution in geothermal drilling with high-pressure liquid nitrogen jet. Applied Thermal Engineering, 129, 1348-1357. doi:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2017.10.042Fossa, M., & Minchio, F. (2013). The effect of borefield geometry and ground thermal load profile on hourly thermal response of geothermal heat pump systems. Energy, 51, 323-329. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2012.12.043SPIN-PET, Via R. Piaggio, 32, 56025, Pontedera ,Italy, http://www.spinpet.it//, [Online; accessed 12-December-2019].SILMA, Via Lombardia 97/00/101, Poggio a Caiano, Italy, http://www.spinpet.it//, [Online; accessed 12-December-2019].AIMPLAS, Plastics Technology Centre, Paterna, Spain, https://www.aimplas.net/aimplas/, [Online; accessed 12-December-2019].CAUDAL - Extruline Systems, Puerto Lumbreras (Murcia), Spain, https://www.caudal.es/index.php/en/, [Online; accessed 12-December-2019].ASTM C 666: [Standard Test Method for Resistance of Concrete to Rapid Freezing and Thawing].ASTM C 531-85: Standard test method for linear shrinkage and coefficient of thermal expansion of chemical-resistant mortars, grouts, monolithic surfacings, and polymer concretes.EN 197-1: Cement - Part 1: composition, specifications and conformity criteria for common cements.EN 445: Grout for prestressing tendons - test methods.SS 137244: Concrete testing – hardened concrete – scaling at freezing.RISE Research Institutes of Sweden, Division Samhällsbyggnad – Infrastructure and Concrete Construction, Stockholm, Sweden, https://www.ri.se/sv, [Online; accessed 12-December-2019].UBeG GbR, Wetzlar, Germany, http://www.ubeg.de. [Online; accessed 12-December-2019]