Correlated Response to Selection for Litter Size Residual Variability in Rabbits' Body Condition

[EN] Selection for decreasing litter size residual variance has been proposed as an indirect way to select for resilience. Resilience has been directly related to welfare. A good body condition and efficient body fat mobilization have been associated with an optimal level of animal welfare. Two rabbit lines have been divergently selected for litter size residual variability. The low line selected for decreasing litter size variance more efficiently managed the body fat from mating to weaning in the second productive cycle in females compared to the high line, which could be related to the lower culling rate reported previously in the low line. Therefore, body condition can be used as a useful biomarker of resilience. A divergent selection experiment for residual variance of litter size at birth was carried out in rabbits during twelve generations. Residual variance of litter size was estimated as the within-doe variance of litter size after pre-correction for year and season as well as parity and lactation status effects. The aim of this work was to study the correlated response to selection for litter size residual variability in body condition from mating to weaning. Body condition is related directly to an animal's fat deposits. Perirenal fat is the main fat deposit in rabbits. Individual body weight (IBW) and perirenal fat thickness (PFT) were used to measure body condition at second mating, delivery, 10 days after delivery, and weaning. Litter size of the first three parities was analyzed. Both lines decreased body condition between mating to delivery; however, the decrease in body condition at delivery was lower in the low line, despite this line having higher litter size at birth (+0.54 kits, p = 0.93). The increment of body condition between delivery and early lactation was slightly higher in the low line. On the other hand, body condition affected success of females' receptivity and fertility at the third mating, e.g., receptive females showed a higher IBW and PFT than unreceptive ones (+129 g and +0.28 mm, respectively), and fertile females had a higher IBW and PFT than unfertile ones (+82 g and +0.28 mm, respectively). In conclusion, the does selected for reducing litter size variability showed a better deal with situations of high-energy demand, such as delivery and lactation, than those selected for increasing litter size variability, which would agree with the better health and welfare condition in the low line.This research was supported by Project AGL2017-86083-C2-2-P, funding by Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion (MIC)-Agencia Estatal de Investigacion (AEI) and el Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional (FEDER).Agea, I.; García, MDLL.; Blasco Mateu, A.; Massanyi, P.; Capcarová, M.; Argente, M. (2020). Correlated Response to Selection for Litter Size Residual Variability in Rabbits' Body Condition. Animals. 10(12):1-8. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10122447181012Colditz, I. G., & Hine, B. C. (2016). Resilience in farm animals: biology, management, breeding and implications for animal welfare. Animal Production Science, 56(12), 1961. doi:10.1071/an15297Berghof, T. V. L., Poppe, M., & Mulder, H. A. (2019). Opportunities to Improve Resilience in Animal Breeding Programs. Frontiers in Genetics, 9. doi:10.3389/fgene.2018.00692Schröder, U. J., & Staufenbiel, R. (2006). Invited Review: Methods to Determine Body Fat Reserves in the Dairy Cow with Special Regard to Ultrasonographic Measurement of Backfat Thickness. Journal of Dairy Science, 89(1), 1-14. doi:10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(06)72064-1Maes, D. G. D., Janssens, G. P. J., Delputte, P., Lammertyn, A., & de Kruif, A. (2004). Back fat measurements in sows from three commercial pig herds: relationship with reproductive efficiency and correlation with visual body condition scores. Livestock Production Science, 91(1-2), 57-67. doi:10.1016/j.livprodsci.2004.06.015Pascual, J. J., Castella, F., Cervera, C., Blas, E., & Fernández-Carmona, J. (2000). The use of ultrasound measurement of perirenal fat thickness to estimate changes in body condition of young female rabbits. Animal Science, 70(3), 435-442. doi:10.1017/s135772980005178xBarletta, R. V., Maturana Filho, M., Carvalho, P. D., Del Valle, T. A., Netto, A. S., Rennó, F. P., … Wiltbank, M. C. (2017). Association of changes among body condition score during the transition period with NEFA and BHBA concentrations, milk production, fertility, and health of Holstein cows. Theriogenology, 104, 30-36. doi:10.1016/j.theriogenology.2017.07.030Van Staaveren, N., Doyle, B., Manzanilla, E. G., Calderón Díaz, J. A., Hanlon, A., & Boyle, L. A. (2017). Validation of carcass lesions as indicators for on-farm health and welfare of pigs. Journal of Animal Science, 95(4), 1528. doi:10.2527/jas2016.1180Sánchez, J. P., de la Fuente, L. F., & Rosell, J. M. (2012). Health and body condition of lactating females on rabbit farms1. Journal of Animal Science, 90(7), 2353-2361. doi:10.2527/jas.2011-4065Mulder, H. A., & Rashidi, H. (2017). Selection on resilience improves disease resistance and tolerance to infections. Journal of Animal Science, 95(8), 3346. doi:10.2527/jas2017.1479Argente, M. J., García, M. L., Zbyňovská, K., Petruška, P., Capcarová, M., & Blasco, A. (2019). Correlated response to selection for litter size environmental variability in rabbits’ resilience. Animal, 13(10), 2348-2355. doi:10.1017/s1751731119000302Blasco, A., Martínez-Álvaro, M., García, M.-L., Ibáñez-Escriche, N., & Argente, M.-J. (2017). Selection for environmental variance of litter size in rabbits. Genetics Selection Evolution, 49(1). doi:10.1186/s12711-017-0323-4Beloumi, D., Blasco, A., Muelas, R., Santacreu, M. A., García, M. de la L., & Argente, M.-J. (2020). Inflammatory Correlated Response in Two Lines of Rabbit Selected Divergently for Litter Size Environmental Variability. Animals, 10(9), 1540. doi:10.3390/ani10091540García, M. L., Blasco, A., García, M. E., & Argente, M. J. (2019). Correlated response in body condition and energy mobilisation in rabbits selected for litter size variability. Animal, 13(4), 784-789. doi:10.1017/s1751731118002203Pascual J.J., Blanco J., Piquer O., & Quevedo F. Cervera C. (2010). Ultrasound measurements of perirenal fat thickness to estimate the body condition of reproducing rabbit does in different physiological states. World Rabbit Science, 12(1). doi:10.4995/wrs.2004.584Iung, L. H. de S., Carvalheiro, R., Neves, H. H. de R., & Mulder, H. A. (2019). Genetics and genomics of uniformity and resilience in livestock and aquaculture species: A review. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics, 137(3), 263-280. doi:10.1111/jbg.12454Agea, I., García, M.-L., Blasco, A., & Argente, M.-J. (2019). Litter Survival Differences between Divergently Selected Lines for Environmental Sensitivity in Rabbits. Animals, 9(9), 603. doi:10.3390/ani9090603Fortun-Lamothe, L. (2006). Energy balance and reproductive performance in rabbit does. Animal Reproduction Science, 93(1-2), 1-15. doi:10.1016/j.anireprosci.2005.06.009Feugier, A., & Fortun-Lamothe, L. (2006). Extensive reproductive rhythm and early weaning improve body condition and fertility of rabbit does. Animal Research, 55(5), 459-470. doi:10.1051/animres:2006025Theilgaard, P., Baselga, M., Blas, E., Friggens, N. C., Cervera, C., & Pascual, J. J. (2009). Differences in productive robustness in rabbits selected for reproductive longevity or litter size. Animal, 3(5), 637-646. doi:10.1017/s1751731109003838Theilgaard, P., Sánchez, J. P., Pascual, J. J., Friggens, N. C., & Baselga, M. (2006). Effect of body fatness and selection for prolificacy on survival of rabbit does assessed using a cryopreserved control population. Livestock Science, 103(1-2), 65-73. doi:10.1016/j.livsci.2006.01.007Arias-Álvarez, M., García-García, R. M., Rebollar, P. G., Revuelta, L., Millán, P., & Lorenzo, P. L. (2009). Influence of metabolic status on oocyte quality and follicular characteristics at different postpartum periods in primiparous rabbit does. Theriogenology, 72(5), 612-623. doi:10.1016/j.theriogenology.2009.04.017Castellini, C. (2007). Reproductive activity and welfare of rabbit does. Italian Journal of Animal Science, 6(sup1), 743-747. doi:10.4081/ijas.2007.1s.743Castellini, C., Dal Bosco, A., Arias-Álvarez, M., Lorenzo, P. L., Cardinali, R., & Rebollar, P. G. (2010). The main factors affecting the reproductive performance of rabbit does: A review. Animal Reproduction Science, 122(3-4), 174-182. doi:10.1016/j.anireprosci.2010.10.003Xiccato, G., Bernardini, M., Castellini, C., Dalle Zotte, A., Queaque, P. I., & Trocino, A. (1999). Effect of postweaning feeding on the performance and energy balance of female rabbits at different physiological states. Journal of Animal Science, 77(2), 416. doi:10.2527/1999.772416xCardinali, R., Dal Bosco, A., Bonanno, A., Di Grigoli, A., Rebollar, P. G., Lorenzo, P. L., & Castellini, C. (2008). Connection between body condition score, chemical characteristics of body and reproductive traits of rabbit does. Livestock Science, 116(1-3), 209-215. doi:10.1016/j.livsci.2007.10.004Castellini, C., Dal Bosco, A., & Cardinali, R. (2006). Long term effect of post-weaning rhythm on the body fat and performance of rabbit doe. Reproduction Nutrition Development, 46(2), 195-204. doi:10.1051/rnd:200600