Between 1992 and 2010, Ethiopian courts prosecuted over five thousand people for the core crimes of genocide and war crimes perpetrated in Ethiopia since 1974. The vast majority of the defendants were convicted and sentenced to a range of penalties applicable under Ethiopian law. This article examines the manner in which Ethiopian courts have punished core crimes. It analyses the domestic law and practice in light of and in comparison with the sentencing practice in the UNICTS and the ICC. The article also discusses whether Ethiopian law and practice have treated the punishment of core crimes differently than the punishment of domestic crimes
The customary dispute resolution mechanisms of Ethiopia are playing an important role in resolving c...
At the end of the state perpetrated largescale violence, two important puzzling questions need to be...
This article evaluates the problems and challenges of international criminal prosecutions in Africa....
Between 1992 and 2010, Ethiopian courts prosecuted over five thousand people for the core crimes of ...
Between 1992 and 2010, over 5,000 individuals - charged with genocide or war crimes - were brought t...
This article analyses the sentencing judgment issued on 11 January 2007 by the Ethiopian Federal Hig...
This article analyses the sentencing judgment issued on 11 January 2007 bythe Ethiopian Federal High...
This article compares sentencing of those convicted of participation in the 1994 genocide in Rwanda....
The purpose of this paper is to review developments which have occurred in the victim’s role in crim...
World War (WW) II coupled with the following international criminal trials were blessing-in-disguise...
This article presents an account of a legal system that has fundamentally failed Ethiopia ́s young a...
The purpose of this paper is to analysis the definition and scope of the crime of Genocide under Eth...
Ethiopia, one of the populous and poorest states in Africa, does not have a comprehensive statutory ...
Purpose of the study: The Ethiopian criminal justice system views crime as an offense against the st...
The FDRE Criminal Justice Policy embodies multiple reforms that are meant to address the various pro...
The customary dispute resolution mechanisms of Ethiopia are playing an important role in resolving c...
At the end of the state perpetrated largescale violence, two important puzzling questions need to be...
This article evaluates the problems and challenges of international criminal prosecutions in Africa....
Between 1992 and 2010, Ethiopian courts prosecuted over five thousand people for the core crimes of ...
Between 1992 and 2010, over 5,000 individuals - charged with genocide or war crimes - were brought t...
This article analyses the sentencing judgment issued on 11 January 2007 by the Ethiopian Federal Hig...
This article analyses the sentencing judgment issued on 11 January 2007 bythe Ethiopian Federal High...
This article compares sentencing of those convicted of participation in the 1994 genocide in Rwanda....
The purpose of this paper is to review developments which have occurred in the victim’s role in crim...
World War (WW) II coupled with the following international criminal trials were blessing-in-disguise...
This article presents an account of a legal system that has fundamentally failed Ethiopia ́s young a...
The purpose of this paper is to analysis the definition and scope of the crime of Genocide under Eth...
Ethiopia, one of the populous and poorest states in Africa, does not have a comprehensive statutory ...
Purpose of the study: The Ethiopian criminal justice system views crime as an offense against the st...
The FDRE Criminal Justice Policy embodies multiple reforms that are meant to address the various pro...
The customary dispute resolution mechanisms of Ethiopia are playing an important role in resolving c...
At the end of the state perpetrated largescale violence, two important puzzling questions need to be...
This article evaluates the problems and challenges of international criminal prosecutions in Africa....