In the version of this article initially published, the labels in the key to Fig. 1f (red bars, Down in responders; blue bars, Up in responders) were incorrect. The correct labels are as follows: red bars, Up in responders; blue bars, Down in responders. Also, the histopathology images in Fig. 2a were incorrect. The correct images are now provided. The errors have been corrected in the HTML and PDF versions of the article
In the version of this article initially published, the label along the right margin of the top row ...
The original version of this article unfortunately contained a mistake. Due to a typesetting error ‘...
Publisher Copyright: © 2021, The Author(s).The original version of this Article contained an error i...
In the version of this article initially published, the bars were not aligned with the data points o...
In the version of this article initially published, a numbering error mistakenly associated author P...
The original version of this Article contained an error in Fig. 3b. In Fig. 3b the “<” symbol in ...
In this Article originally published, owing to a technical error, author affiliations were incorrect...
Erratum for: Nature. 2020 Oct;586(7830):589-593. PMID: 33469216. In the print version of this Articl...
Following publication of the original article [1], the authors notified us of a few requested editio...
In this Article originally published, owing to a technical error, author affiliations were incorrect...
In the version of this article initially published, the sample size (n = 794) was incorrect in Fig. ...
Correction to: Scientific Reports https://doi.org/10.1038/srep32062, published online 31 August 201
The originally published version of this Article contained errors in Figure 4. In panel b, the squar...
Following publication of the original article [1], the authors reported an error in the labeling of ...
In the Original Publication of the article, In Introduction part, 7th line, the value “5-100nM” has ...
In the version of this article initially published, the label along the right margin of the top row ...
The original version of this article unfortunately contained a mistake. Due to a typesetting error ‘...
Publisher Copyright: © 2021, The Author(s).The original version of this Article contained an error i...
In the version of this article initially published, the bars were not aligned with the data points o...
In the version of this article initially published, a numbering error mistakenly associated author P...
The original version of this Article contained an error in Fig. 3b. In Fig. 3b the “<” symbol in ...
In this Article originally published, owing to a technical error, author affiliations were incorrect...
Erratum for: Nature. 2020 Oct;586(7830):589-593. PMID: 33469216. In the print version of this Articl...
Following publication of the original article [1], the authors notified us of a few requested editio...
In this Article originally published, owing to a technical error, author affiliations were incorrect...
In the version of this article initially published, the sample size (n = 794) was incorrect in Fig. ...
Correction to: Scientific Reports https://doi.org/10.1038/srep32062, published online 31 August 201
The originally published version of this Article contained errors in Figure 4. In panel b, the squar...
Following publication of the original article [1], the authors reported an error in the labeling of ...
In the Original Publication of the article, In Introduction part, 7th line, the value “5-100nM” has ...
In the version of this article initially published, the label along the right margin of the top row ...
The original version of this article unfortunately contained a mistake. Due to a typesetting error ‘...
Publisher Copyright: © 2021, The Author(s).The original version of this Article contained an error i...