We present a framework for formal refutational completeness proofs of abstract provers that implement saturation calculi, such as ordered resolution or superposition. The framework relies on modular extensions of lifted redundancy criteria. It allows us to extend redundancy criteria so that they cover subsumption, and also to model entire prover architectures in such a way that the static refutational completeness of a calculus immediately implies the dynamic refutational completeness of a prover implementing the calculus, for instance within an Otter orloop. Our framework is mechanized in Isabelle/
International audienceWe present a formalization of the first half of Bachmair and Ganz-inger's chap...
In this chapter we describe the theoretical concepts and results that form the basis of state-of-the...
We address the problems of combining satisfiability procedures and consider two combination scenario...
A crucial operation of saturation theorem provers is deletion of subsumed formulas. Designers of pro...
We present a formalization in Isabelle/HOL of a comprehensive framework for proving the completeness...
Automated state-of-the-art theorem provers are typically optimised for particular strategies, and th...
International audienceWe present a formalization in Isabelle/HOL of a comprehensive framework for pr...
AbstractWe explore how different proof orderings induce different notions of saturation and complete...
An abstract framework of canonical inference is used to explore how different proof orderings induce...
We present an Isabelle/HOL formalization of the first half of Bachmair and Ganzinger’s chapter on re...
We apply the framework of Bachmair and Ganzinger for saturation-based theorem proving to derive a ra...
Applications in software verification often require determining the satisfiability of first-order fo...
Applications in software verification often require determining the satisfiability of first-order fo...
In this paper we solve a long-standing open problem by showing that strict superposition---that is, ...
The superposition calculus, which underlies first-order theorem provers such as E, SPASS, and Vampir...
International audienceWe present a formalization of the first half of Bachmair and Ganz-inger's chap...
In this chapter we describe the theoretical concepts and results that form the basis of state-of-the...
We address the problems of combining satisfiability procedures and consider two combination scenario...
A crucial operation of saturation theorem provers is deletion of subsumed formulas. Designers of pro...
We present a formalization in Isabelle/HOL of a comprehensive framework for proving the completeness...
Automated state-of-the-art theorem provers are typically optimised for particular strategies, and th...
International audienceWe present a formalization in Isabelle/HOL of a comprehensive framework for pr...
AbstractWe explore how different proof orderings induce different notions of saturation and complete...
An abstract framework of canonical inference is used to explore how different proof orderings induce...
We present an Isabelle/HOL formalization of the first half of Bachmair and Ganzinger’s chapter on re...
We apply the framework of Bachmair and Ganzinger for saturation-based theorem proving to derive a ra...
Applications in software verification often require determining the satisfiability of first-order fo...
Applications in software verification often require determining the satisfiability of first-order fo...
In this paper we solve a long-standing open problem by showing that strict superposition---that is, ...
The superposition calculus, which underlies first-order theorem provers such as E, SPASS, and Vampir...
International audienceWe present a formalization of the first half of Bachmair and Ganz-inger's chap...
In this chapter we describe the theoretical concepts and results that form the basis of state-of-the...
We address the problems of combining satisfiability procedures and consider two combination scenario...