Total warm ischemia and reperfusion impairs flow in all rat gut layers but increases leukocyte-vessel wall interactions in the submucosa only

OBJECTIVE: To study the effect of warm ischemia and reperfusion (I/R) on local perfusion and leukocyte-vessel wall interactions in vivo in all small bowel layers, and to quantify small bowel tissue injury histologically and by measuring intestinal fatty acid binding protein (I-FABP) release from the enterocytes. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Gut injury as a result of I/R plays a pivotal role in a variety of clinical conditions, such as small bowel transplantation, heart or aortic surgery, and (septic) shock. The precise mechanism behind I/R injury and the role of microvascular changes remain unclear. The influence of warm I/R of the gut on microvascular parameters in the different gut layers has not been studied before. METHODS: Anesthetized Lewis rats were either subjected to 30 minutes of ischemia and 1 hour of reperfusion or sham-treated as controls. After ligating the inferior mesenteric artery, total warm ischemia was induced by clamping the superior mesenteric artery. Intravital video microscopic measurements were obtained at intervals. Tissue injury of the small bowel and other organs was histologically evaluated afterward. In addition, plasma levels of I-FABP were determined to measure enterocyte damage. RESULTS: After ischemia, mean red blood cell velocity decreased significantly in all layers of the small bowel, but no diameter changes were observed. Leukocyte-vessel wall interactions increased in the submucosa but not in the muscle layers. Plasma levels of I-FABP significantly increased from 30 minutes of reperfusion onward. The intestinal mucosa was severely injured; no histologic damage was detected in other tissues. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first in vivo study showing that total warm ischemia of the rat gut impairs perfusion in the whole small bowel, whereas leukocyte-vessel wall interactions increase in the submucosal layer only. Therefore, the early inflammatory response to I/R seems to be limited to the submucosa. Both microvascular effects may have contributed to the severe morphologic and functional mucosal injury observed after I/R