In this introduction, we underline the theoretical connection between responsibility, luck, and equality upon which luck egalitarianism rests, and we consider the social and political relevance of the approach. We then situate Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen’s version of the view as proposed in his book, Luck Egalitarianism, in the egalitarian landscape. Lastly, we introduce the six papers that make up this symposium: some are critiques from within or outside luck egalitarianism, while others engage with the theory by expanding the scope of luck egalitarianism.</p
A standard formulation of luck-egalitarianism says that ‘it is [in itself] bad – unjust and unfair –...
My thesis engages with the question about what it means to treat each other as equals, as this has b...
The leading discourse about luck egalitarianism has been informed by the distinction between equali...
In this introduction, we underline the theoretical connection between responsibility, luck, and equa...
Luck egalitarianism originated in an attempt to respond to the conservative objection that egalitari...
Some luck egalitarians argue that justice is just one value among others and is thus not necessarily...
Egalitarians claim that inequality in society is only justified to the extent that it results from c...
Luck egalitarianism - the theory that makes individual responsibility central to distributive justic...
Lippert-Rasmussen has proposed a new version of luck egalitarianism: equality of concern. In this ar...
Luck egalitarianism makes a fundamental distinction between inequalities for which agents are respon...
The family of theories dubbed ‘luck egalitarianism’ represent an attempt to infuse egalitarian think...
The concept of responsibility plays a crucial part in the debate between proponents of democratic eq...
Luck egalitarianism is a broad theory of justice that emphasises the importance of responsibility (t...
A conventional distinction – that between an “individualized” and a “collective” concept of social ...
Luck egaiitarianism is an interpretation of equality that distinguishes between inequalities for whi...
A standard formulation of luck-egalitarianism says that ‘it is [in itself] bad – unjust and unfair –...
My thesis engages with the question about what it means to treat each other as equals, as this has b...
The leading discourse about luck egalitarianism has been informed by the distinction between equali...
In this introduction, we underline the theoretical connection between responsibility, luck, and equa...
Luck egalitarianism originated in an attempt to respond to the conservative objection that egalitari...
Some luck egalitarians argue that justice is just one value among others and is thus not necessarily...
Egalitarians claim that inequality in society is only justified to the extent that it results from c...
Luck egalitarianism - the theory that makes individual responsibility central to distributive justic...
Lippert-Rasmussen has proposed a new version of luck egalitarianism: equality of concern. In this ar...
Luck egalitarianism makes a fundamental distinction between inequalities for which agents are respon...
The family of theories dubbed ‘luck egalitarianism’ represent an attempt to infuse egalitarian think...
The concept of responsibility plays a crucial part in the debate between proponents of democratic eq...
Luck egalitarianism is a broad theory of justice that emphasises the importance of responsibility (t...
A conventional distinction – that between an “individualized” and a “collective” concept of social ...
Luck egaiitarianism is an interpretation of equality that distinguishes between inequalities for whi...
A standard formulation of luck-egalitarianism says that ‘it is [in itself] bad – unjust and unfair –...
My thesis engages with the question about what it means to treat each other as equals, as this has b...
The leading discourse about luck egalitarianism has been informed by the distinction between equali...