This study analyses the differences between what the academic communities of a country regard should be included as original research publications for evaluation and funding and what the commercial providers of Scopus and Web of Science are able to provide within a similar limitation to publication type. The patterns of differences are described both with regard to publication type, field of research and language
In recent years, numerous articles have compared the coverage, features, and citation analysis capab...
Document content is comparing and analyzing of two greatest citated sources, Web of Science (Thomson...
Both Web of Science and Scopus are critical components of the current research ecosystem, providing ...
Our aim is to compare the coverage of the Scopus database with that of Ulrich, to determine just how...
Our aim is to compare the coverage of the Scopus database with that of Ulrich, to determine just how...
International audienceNowadays, the world's scientific community has been publishing an enormous num...
The evaluation of research outputs in the form of journal articles is important to help with monitor...
and citation database covering all areas of science thus becoming an invaluable tool in bibliometric...
Bibliometric methods are used in multiple fields for a variety of purposes, namely for research eva...
Nowadays, the world’s scientific community has been publishing an enormous number of papers in diffe...
The main purpose of this study is to evaluate the online electronic scholarly journals of Al-Neelain...
M.PhilCiting is the process by which scholars give recognition to research used by another academic ...
Researchers use different resources to trace the research done in their field of interest and to fin...
El propósito del presente trabajo es analizar y comparar el grado de cobertura de las revistas, la p...
The assessment of research based on the journal in which it is published is a widely adopted practic...
In recent years, numerous articles have compared the coverage, features, and citation analysis capab...
Document content is comparing and analyzing of two greatest citated sources, Web of Science (Thomson...
Both Web of Science and Scopus are critical components of the current research ecosystem, providing ...
Our aim is to compare the coverage of the Scopus database with that of Ulrich, to determine just how...
Our aim is to compare the coverage of the Scopus database with that of Ulrich, to determine just how...
International audienceNowadays, the world's scientific community has been publishing an enormous num...
The evaluation of research outputs in the form of journal articles is important to help with monitor...
and citation database covering all areas of science thus becoming an invaluable tool in bibliometric...
Bibliometric methods are used in multiple fields for a variety of purposes, namely for research eva...
Nowadays, the world’s scientific community has been publishing an enormous number of papers in diffe...
The main purpose of this study is to evaluate the online electronic scholarly journals of Al-Neelain...
M.PhilCiting is the process by which scholars give recognition to research used by another academic ...
Researchers use different resources to trace the research done in their field of interest and to fin...
El propósito del presente trabajo es analizar y comparar el grado de cobertura de las revistas, la p...
The assessment of research based on the journal in which it is published is a widely adopted practic...
In recent years, numerous articles have compared the coverage, features, and citation analysis capab...
Document content is comparing and analyzing of two greatest citated sources, Web of Science (Thomson...
Both Web of Science and Scopus are critical components of the current research ecosystem, providing ...