The Periodic Table of Arguments is based on a grammatical understanding of categorical statements. A commentator has pointed out that taking a logical understanding of such statements would render one of the distinctions constituting the theoretical framework of the table unwarranted. In this paper, it is examined how arguments based on syllogistic inferences are represented in the table by comparing the theoretical framework of the Periodic Table of Arguments to that of Aristotle’s assertoric syllogistic
Abstract. In the Organon Aristotle describes some deductive schemata in which inconsis-tencies do no...
We give a simple definition of validity for syllogisms involving necessary and assertoric premises w...
As a discipline, logic is arguably constituted of two main sub-projects: formal theories of argument...
The existing classifications of arguments are unsatisfying in a number of ways. This paper proposes ...
Although the theory of the assertoric syllogism was Aristotle's great invention, one which dominated...
The aim of this paper is to indicate the systematic place of arguments based on the concept of analo...
ABSTRACT: For the Stoics, a syllogism is a formally valid argument; the primary function of their s...
This is the Commentary on Wagemans\u27 paper Constructing a Periodic Table of Arguments
This paper sets out to evaluate the claim that Aristotle’s Assertoric Syllogistic is a relevance log...
Jan Łukasiewicz’s analysis of Aristotle’s syllogism drew attention to the nature of syllogisms as co...
23rd International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Other Applications of Applied Intelligen...
DoctoralAddenda: The paper has the only aim to provide a brief overview on traditional Syllogistic f...
International audienceIn this paper we first show that Robin Smith's ecthetic system SE for Aristotl...
§1 In J. Corcoran 〔4〕, 〔5〕 and T. Smiley 〔16〕, it has been shown that Aristotle's syllogistic in Pri...
Aristotle in Analytica Posteriora presented a notion of proof as a special case of syllogism. In the...
Abstract. In the Organon Aristotle describes some deductive schemata in which inconsis-tencies do no...
We give a simple definition of validity for syllogisms involving necessary and assertoric premises w...
As a discipline, logic is arguably constituted of two main sub-projects: formal theories of argument...
The existing classifications of arguments are unsatisfying in a number of ways. This paper proposes ...
Although the theory of the assertoric syllogism was Aristotle's great invention, one which dominated...
The aim of this paper is to indicate the systematic place of arguments based on the concept of analo...
ABSTRACT: For the Stoics, a syllogism is a formally valid argument; the primary function of their s...
This is the Commentary on Wagemans\u27 paper Constructing a Periodic Table of Arguments
This paper sets out to evaluate the claim that Aristotle’s Assertoric Syllogistic is a relevance log...
Jan Łukasiewicz’s analysis of Aristotle’s syllogism drew attention to the nature of syllogisms as co...
23rd International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Other Applications of Applied Intelligen...
DoctoralAddenda: The paper has the only aim to provide a brief overview on traditional Syllogistic f...
International audienceIn this paper we first show that Robin Smith's ecthetic system SE for Aristotl...
§1 In J. Corcoran 〔4〕, 〔5〕 and T. Smiley 〔16〕, it has been shown that Aristotle's syllogistic in Pri...
Aristotle in Analytica Posteriora presented a notion of proof as a special case of syllogism. In the...
Abstract. In the Organon Aristotle describes some deductive schemata in which inconsis-tencies do no...
We give a simple definition of validity for syllogisms involving necessary and assertoric premises w...
As a discipline, logic is arguably constituted of two main sub-projects: formal theories of argument...