The willful blindness doctrine at criminal law is well-established and generally fits with moral intuitions of guilt. It also stands in direct tension with the first principle of American criminal law: legality. This Article argues that courts could largely preserve the doctrine and entirely avoid the legality problem with a simple shift: willful blindness ought to be reconceptualized as a form of evidence
This Article presents a revolution in the rules of confessions and their admissibility. It proposes ...
It is a common misconception that there is a line between criminal and innocent conduct that is tran...
Courts commonly allow willful ignorance to satisfy the knowledge element of a crime. The traditional...
The willful blindness doctrine at criminal law is well-established and generally fits with moral int...
This article was presented at “Guilty Minds: A Virtual Conference on Mens Rea and Criminal Justice R...
Ignorantia legis non excusat-ignorance of the law does not excuse-is a centuries-old criminal law ma...
This Article investigates the limits of the willful ignorance doctrine as employed in federal crimin...
This article introduces the main conceptual and normative questions about willful ignorance. Section...
(Excerpt) The overriding aim of this Article is to shore up the normative basis for the willful igno...
The following paper examines a recent development in the evolution of mens rea. The author traces th...
According to the willful ignorance doctrine, when conviction of a crime requires knowledge of some f...
Willful blindness is not an appropriate substitute for knowledge in crimes that require a mens rea o...
This is a book about the legal fiction that sometimes we know what we don't. The willful ignorance d...
This paper will proceed in four parts. Part I will consist of a brief summary of current jurispruden...
This article discusses the difficulty of the doctrine of wilful blindness and the welcome clarificat...
This Article presents a revolution in the rules of confessions and their admissibility. It proposes ...
It is a common misconception that there is a line between criminal and innocent conduct that is tran...
Courts commonly allow willful ignorance to satisfy the knowledge element of a crime. The traditional...
The willful blindness doctrine at criminal law is well-established and generally fits with moral int...
This article was presented at “Guilty Minds: A Virtual Conference on Mens Rea and Criminal Justice R...
Ignorantia legis non excusat-ignorance of the law does not excuse-is a centuries-old criminal law ma...
This Article investigates the limits of the willful ignorance doctrine as employed in federal crimin...
This article introduces the main conceptual and normative questions about willful ignorance. Section...
(Excerpt) The overriding aim of this Article is to shore up the normative basis for the willful igno...
The following paper examines a recent development in the evolution of mens rea. The author traces th...
According to the willful ignorance doctrine, when conviction of a crime requires knowledge of some f...
Willful blindness is not an appropriate substitute for knowledge in crimes that require a mens rea o...
This is a book about the legal fiction that sometimes we know what we don't. The willful ignorance d...
This paper will proceed in four parts. Part I will consist of a brief summary of current jurispruden...
This article discusses the difficulty of the doctrine of wilful blindness and the welcome clarificat...
This Article presents a revolution in the rules of confessions and their admissibility. It proposes ...
It is a common misconception that there is a line between criminal and innocent conduct that is tran...
Courts commonly allow willful ignorance to satisfy the knowledge element of a crime. The traditional...