Impact and residual fatigue behavior of ARALL and AS6/5245 composite materials

Aramide fiber reinforced aluminum laminates (ARALL) represent a cross between resin matrix composites and metals. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact sensitivity of this concept. Two types of ARALL (7075 aluminum prestrained and 2024 aluminum not prestrained) were tested through static indentation and the results compared to sheet 2024-T3 and 7075-T6 aluminum alloys. A state-of-the-art composite (AS6/5245) was also tested and compared to the ARALL. Further, the two types of ARALL material and the composite were dynamically impacted at two energy levels and fatigue tested to determine residual fatigue strength. Both forms of the ARALL material had worse impact resistance than monolithic sheet aluminum. The ARALL material made with 2024-T3 aluminum had better impact resistance than did the laminates made with 7075-T6 aluminum. The ARALL materials are at least equal to the composite material in impact damage resistance and are better for impact detection. The composite material has higher residual fatigue strength after impact than the ARALL material and is 25 percent lighter. The prestraining of the ARALL greatly reduces the fatigue growth of impact damage