Add to ORKGIn this brief, Amici respond to two of the assumptions that underpin the case for race-preferential admissions policies: (1) that these policies promote racial integration on campuses; and (2) that these policies are the result of expert academic judgments concerning the pedagogical benefits of a racially diverse class. The evidence shows that neither assumption is true
In Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin, the United States Supreme Court affirmed well-establishe...
The Supreme Court has established the parameters within which universities can practice race-conscio...
The brief of Amici Curiae on Behalf of a Committee of Concerned Black Graduates of ABA Accredited La...
In this brief, Amici respond to two of the assumptions that underpin the case for race-preferential ...
Legal Scholars Defending Race-Conscious Admissions uplift two underappreciated dynamics in the subje...
In this brief, the CRP does not address how social science research relates to the constitutionality...
The Sixth Circuit below correctly ruled that the applicable precedent in this case is Regents of the...
Consistent with Justice Powell’s controlling opinion in Regents of the University of California v. B...
The district court below correctly upheld the constitutionality of the Lynn School Committee’s Volun...
Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard has not only exposed ways in which Harvard College’s admissi...
In June of 2003, the debate over the use of race-based preferential treatment in university and coll...
The Supreme Court has upheld affirmative action in higher education recognizing that the considerati...
The District Court correctly upheld the constitutionality of the Jefferson County Board of Education...
Last month the Supreme Court struck down affirmative action in Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v....
In two recent cases involving the University of Michigan, the Supreme Court examined whether race sh...
In Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin, the United States Supreme Court affirmed well-establishe...
The Supreme Court has established the parameters within which universities can practice race-conscio...
The brief of Amici Curiae on Behalf of a Committee of Concerned Black Graduates of ABA Accredited La...
In this brief, Amici respond to two of the assumptions that underpin the case for race-preferential ...
Legal Scholars Defending Race-Conscious Admissions uplift two underappreciated dynamics in the subje...
In this brief, the CRP does not address how social science research relates to the constitutionality...
The Sixth Circuit below correctly ruled that the applicable precedent in this case is Regents of the...
Consistent with Justice Powell’s controlling opinion in Regents of the University of California v. B...
The district court below correctly upheld the constitutionality of the Lynn School Committee’s Volun...
Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard has not only exposed ways in which Harvard College’s admissi...
In June of 2003, the debate over the use of race-based preferential treatment in university and coll...
The Supreme Court has upheld affirmative action in higher education recognizing that the considerati...
The District Court correctly upheld the constitutionality of the Jefferson County Board of Education...
Last month the Supreme Court struck down affirmative action in Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v....
In two recent cases involving the University of Michigan, the Supreme Court examined whether race sh...
In Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin, the United States Supreme Court affirmed well-establishe...
The Supreme Court has established the parameters within which universities can practice race-conscio...
The brief of Amici Curiae on Behalf of a Committee of Concerned Black Graduates of ABA Accredited La...