In this paper I defend the claim that concepts are not public. I argue that two of the main constraints for theories of concepts, namely (1) that concepts are public and (2) that they serve to explain Frege Cases, are in tension. (1) requires concepts to be individuated coarsely, while (2) requires concepts to be individuated finely. Thus, no theory of concepts can accommodate both (1) and (2). I argue that (2) is a non-negotiable constraint for theories of concepts, while (1) is negotiable. Therefore, theories of concepts should individuate concepts finely enough to solve Frege Cases, and claim that concepts are not public
A theory of conceptual development must provide an account of the innate representational repertoire...
(This paper responds to some criticisms made by Robert J. Stainton of an earlier-written but later-p...
I defend the Fregean model of propositions: propositions are (a) the referents of that-clauses and (...
In this paper I defend the claim that concepts are not public. I argue that two of the main constrai...
In this paper I defend the claim that concepts are not public. I argue that two of the main constrai...
In this paper I defend the claim that concepts are not public. I argue that two of the main constrai...
In academic philosophy and in ordinary life, it is often difficult to tell whether two people are re...
An influential tradition holds that thoughts are public: different thinkers share many of their thou...
The paper aims to disarm arguments, prevalent in diverse philosophical contexts, that deny the legit...
International audienceIt is a well-known Gödelian thesis, since Hao Wang book of 1996, that a pure t...
Distinct systems for representing concepts as prototypes, exemplars, and theories are closely integr...
The debate about concepts has always been shaped by a contrast between subjectivism, which treats th...
It is often claimed that concepts are the building blocks of thoughts. If this claim is true, as I t...
The paper is a critical examination of Peacocke\u27s pioneering work on concepts as grounding the po...
Philosophers have always tried to explain what concepts are. Currently, most neo- Fregean philosophe...
A theory of conceptual development must provide an account of the innate representational repertoire...
(This paper responds to some criticisms made by Robert J. Stainton of an earlier-written but later-p...
I defend the Fregean model of propositions: propositions are (a) the referents of that-clauses and (...
In this paper I defend the claim that concepts are not public. I argue that two of the main constrai...
In this paper I defend the claim that concepts are not public. I argue that two of the main constrai...
In this paper I defend the claim that concepts are not public. I argue that two of the main constrai...
In academic philosophy and in ordinary life, it is often difficult to tell whether two people are re...
An influential tradition holds that thoughts are public: different thinkers share many of their thou...
The paper aims to disarm arguments, prevalent in diverse philosophical contexts, that deny the legit...
International audienceIt is a well-known Gödelian thesis, since Hao Wang book of 1996, that a pure t...
Distinct systems for representing concepts as prototypes, exemplars, and theories are closely integr...
The debate about concepts has always been shaped by a contrast between subjectivism, which treats th...
It is often claimed that concepts are the building blocks of thoughts. If this claim is true, as I t...
The paper is a critical examination of Peacocke\u27s pioneering work on concepts as grounding the po...
Philosophers have always tried to explain what concepts are. Currently, most neo- Fregean philosophe...
A theory of conceptual development must provide an account of the innate representational repertoire...
(This paper responds to some criticisms made by Robert J. Stainton of an earlier-written but later-p...
I defend the Fregean model of propositions: propositions are (a) the referents of that-clauses and (...