Most noncooperative game theoretic models of international environmental agreements (IEAs) draw a pessimistic picture of the prospective of successful cooperation. In this paper, we consider the possibility that countries agree on modest instead of ambitious abatement targets. It is shown that this can be an explanation for higher participation and more successful treaties. Thus, modesty may well pay, though the first-best optimum cannot be achieved. It is also demonstrated that our model extension makes it easier to relate the stylized model to actual negotiations
Can we achieve the ambitious mitigation targets needed to avert dangerous global warming? Research n...
This paper surveys theories of international environmental agreements. Central to the analysis is th...
We examine the size of stable coalitions in a participation game that has been used to model interna...
Most noncooperative game theoretic models of international environmental agreements (IEAs) draw a pe...
Most noncooperative game theoretic models of international environmental agreements (IEAs) draw a pe...
We reassess the well-known “narrow-but-deep” versus “broad-but-shallow” trade-off in international e...
This paper applies the theory of social situations to study whether international environmental agre...
The regulation of environmental externalities at the global level requires international agreements ...
Most theoretical work on the formation of IEAs has implicitly assumed that trade relationships betwe...
The negotiation and ratification of the Kyoto Protocol has spawned a body of literature aimed at ana...
The negotiation and ratification of the Kyoto Protocol has spawned a body of literature aimed at ana...
We examine the formation of International Environmental Agreements (IEAs) modelled as a two-stage no...
The dissertation examines free-riding behavior and externality problems using game theory and mechan...
We analyze participation in international environmental agreements (IEAs) in a dynamic game where co...
A puzzle in the literature on the formation of coalitions supporting International Environmental Agr...
Can we achieve the ambitious mitigation targets needed to avert dangerous global warming? Research n...
This paper surveys theories of international environmental agreements. Central to the analysis is th...
We examine the size of stable coalitions in a participation game that has been used to model interna...
Most noncooperative game theoretic models of international environmental agreements (IEAs) draw a pe...
Most noncooperative game theoretic models of international environmental agreements (IEAs) draw a pe...
We reassess the well-known “narrow-but-deep” versus “broad-but-shallow” trade-off in international e...
This paper applies the theory of social situations to study whether international environmental agre...
The regulation of environmental externalities at the global level requires international agreements ...
Most theoretical work on the formation of IEAs has implicitly assumed that trade relationships betwe...
The negotiation and ratification of the Kyoto Protocol has spawned a body of literature aimed at ana...
The negotiation and ratification of the Kyoto Protocol has spawned a body of literature aimed at ana...
We examine the formation of International Environmental Agreements (IEAs) modelled as a two-stage no...
The dissertation examines free-riding behavior and externality problems using game theory and mechan...
We analyze participation in international environmental agreements (IEAs) in a dynamic game where co...
A puzzle in the literature on the formation of coalitions supporting International Environmental Agr...
Can we achieve the ambitious mitigation targets needed to avert dangerous global warming? Research n...
This paper surveys theories of international environmental agreements. Central to the analysis is th...
We examine the size of stable coalitions in a participation game that has been used to model interna...