In making assertions one takes on commitments to the consistency of what one asserts and to the logical consequences of what one asserts. Although there is no quick link between belief and assertion, the dialectical requirements on assertion feed back into normative constraints on those beliefs that constitute one’s evidence. But if we are not certain of many of our beliefs and that uncertainty is modelled in terms of probabilities, then there is at least prima facie incoherence between the normative constraints on belief and the probability-like structure of degrees of belief. I suggest that the norm-governed practice relating to degrees of belief is the evaluation of betting odds
ABSTRACT. Physical laws are irresistible. Logical rules are not. That is why logic is said to be nor...
Many accounts of structural rationality give a special role to logic. This paper reviews the problem...
peer reviewedThis paper defends the view that in a certain sense evidence is normative. Neither a bi...
In making assertions one takes on commitments to the consistency of what one asserts and to the logi...
In making assertions one takes on commitments to the consistency of what one asserts and to the logi...
Starting from John MacFarlane's recent survey of answers to the question 'What is assertion?', I def...
What are people who disagree about logic disagreeing about? The paper argues that (in a wide range ...
Imagine that the preface to a professor’s book implicitly asserts that all the propositions in the r...
Probabilism is committed to two theses: 1) Opinion comes in degrees-call them degrees of belief, or ...
Abstract: I defend a conception of Logic as normative for the sort of activities in which inferences...
Physical laws are irresistible. Logical rules are not. That is why logic is said to be normative. Gi...
We argue that knowledge is not the norm of belief given that ‘I believe’ is used to hedge. We explor...
Logic arguably plays a role in the normativity of reasoning. In particular, there are plausible norm...
Edited by Markus Knauff and Wolfgang SpohnInternational audienceThis chapter surveys recent approach...
For reasoning about uncertain situations, we have probability theory, and we have logics of knowledg...
ABSTRACT. Physical laws are irresistible. Logical rules are not. That is why logic is said to be nor...
Many accounts of structural rationality give a special role to logic. This paper reviews the problem...
peer reviewedThis paper defends the view that in a certain sense evidence is normative. Neither a bi...
In making assertions one takes on commitments to the consistency of what one asserts and to the logi...
In making assertions one takes on commitments to the consistency of what one asserts and to the logi...
Starting from John MacFarlane's recent survey of answers to the question 'What is assertion?', I def...
What are people who disagree about logic disagreeing about? The paper argues that (in a wide range ...
Imagine that the preface to a professor’s book implicitly asserts that all the propositions in the r...
Probabilism is committed to two theses: 1) Opinion comes in degrees-call them degrees of belief, or ...
Abstract: I defend a conception of Logic as normative for the sort of activities in which inferences...
Physical laws are irresistible. Logical rules are not. That is why logic is said to be normative. Gi...
We argue that knowledge is not the norm of belief given that ‘I believe’ is used to hedge. We explor...
Logic arguably plays a role in the normativity of reasoning. In particular, there are plausible norm...
Edited by Markus Knauff and Wolfgang SpohnInternational audienceThis chapter surveys recent approach...
For reasoning about uncertain situations, we have probability theory, and we have logics of knowledg...
ABSTRACT. Physical laws are irresistible. Logical rules are not. That is why logic is said to be nor...
Many accounts of structural rationality give a special role to logic. This paper reviews the problem...
peer reviewedThis paper defends the view that in a certain sense evidence is normative. Neither a bi...