Add to ORKGA response to Dan Markel, ' Retributive Justice and the Demands of Democratic Citizenship', which criticises in particular his rejectiont of legal moralism, and his accounts both of mala in se and of mala prohibita
This article is part of a symposium issue on Scott Shapiro\u27s book, Legality. It explores the ques...
Modern states criminalise many actions that intuitively do not seem morally wrong, particularly in t...
Moral and legal philosophy are too entangled: moral philosophy is prone to model interpersonal moral...
time: 2.30-4.30pmroom: Osgoode Hall – IKB 2010speaker: Dan Markel (FSU)respondent: François Tanguay-...
The idea that victims of social injustice who commit crimes ought not to be subject to punishment ha...
In a comment on Christopher Bennett's The Apology Ritual, I sketch an alternative route to an accoun...
I shall use this occasion mostly to clarify what the legal moralist theory of criminal legislation p...
After distinguishing different types of Legal Moralism (positive/negative; modest/ ambitious) I defe...
This article argues that the justification of punishment is best conceived as a problem of political...
There are two commonly recognized "theories" of criminal law: utilitarianism, which sees criminal la...
The publications of the Law Reform Commission raise many ethical issues. One question - how distribu...
There is much with which to agree, and to admire, in Bennett’s fine book [Bennett (2008)]:1 in this ...
The notion of “democratizing criminal law” has an initial appeal because, after all, we believe in t...
Harming other people is prima facie wrong. Unless we can be very certain that doing so is justified ...
Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/43163/1/10982_2005_Article_BF01000525.p...
This article is part of a symposium issue on Scott Shapiro\u27s book, Legality. It explores the ques...
Modern states criminalise many actions that intuitively do not seem morally wrong, particularly in t...
Moral and legal philosophy are too entangled: moral philosophy is prone to model interpersonal moral...
time: 2.30-4.30pmroom: Osgoode Hall – IKB 2010speaker: Dan Markel (FSU)respondent: François Tanguay-...
The idea that victims of social injustice who commit crimes ought not to be subject to punishment ha...
In a comment on Christopher Bennett's The Apology Ritual, I sketch an alternative route to an accoun...
I shall use this occasion mostly to clarify what the legal moralist theory of criminal legislation p...
After distinguishing different types of Legal Moralism (positive/negative; modest/ ambitious) I defe...
This article argues that the justification of punishment is best conceived as a problem of political...
There are two commonly recognized "theories" of criminal law: utilitarianism, which sees criminal la...
The publications of the Law Reform Commission raise many ethical issues. One question - how distribu...
There is much with which to agree, and to admire, in Bennett’s fine book [Bennett (2008)]:1 in this ...
The notion of “democratizing criminal law” has an initial appeal because, after all, we believe in t...
Harming other people is prima facie wrong. Unless we can be very certain that doing so is justified ...
Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/43163/1/10982_2005_Article_BF01000525.p...
This article is part of a symposium issue on Scott Shapiro\u27s book, Legality. It explores the ques...
Modern states criminalise many actions that intuitively do not seem morally wrong, particularly in t...
Moral and legal philosophy are too entangled: moral philosophy is prone to model interpersonal moral...