1Though interpreting is to a great extent about the interlinguistic reproduction of arguments, argumentation theory is almost completely overlooked by interpreting studies, which partly explains the frequent production of pragmatically inappropriate interpreted texts. Against the theoretical gap, the paper puts forward a descriptive argumentation approach to political speeches with a view to their simultaneous interpretation, in the spirit of making the case for a systematic contribution of argumentation studies to interpretation theory and training.reservedmixedBrambilla, EmanueleBrambilla, Emanuel
In everyday discourse we retrieve the meaning of verbal or written utterances by means of different ...
This book shows how research in linguistic pragmatics, philosophy of language, and rhetoric can be c...
none4siThis paper shows how defeasible argumentation schemes can be used to represent the logical st...
The present paper is mainly addressed to interpreting scholars who wish to focus their studies on th...
The “argumentative turn” in policy-making entails the close and systematic study of policy-making in...
The paper entitled «Linguistic, psychological and methodical aspects of using argumentative phrases ...
This paper surveys the contributions to the study of argumentation in the two decades since the work...
Writing about argumentation is a daunting task for at least one main reason. Argumentation occupies ...
1The paper addresses the triggers of the ‘pragmatic dark’ (Viaggio 2002, 229), a frequent predicamen...
2noThe aim of this paper is to explore the status of argumentative discourse. We argue that argument...
In this paper a specific method of interpreting arguments is developed and justified. The aim of thi...
The contrastive rhetoric hypothesis (Kaplan, 1966) predicts that language users across cultures will...
The main aim of an argumentative speech act complex, as defined in argumentation theory, is to resol...
The article offers a discourse-analytic examination of original (English) and interpreted (Polish) v...
This book explores the construction of agreement in the argumentative process, aiming to investigate...
In everyday discourse we retrieve the meaning of verbal or written utterances by means of different ...
This book shows how research in linguistic pragmatics, philosophy of language, and rhetoric can be c...
none4siThis paper shows how defeasible argumentation schemes can be used to represent the logical st...
The present paper is mainly addressed to interpreting scholars who wish to focus their studies on th...
The “argumentative turn” in policy-making entails the close and systematic study of policy-making in...
The paper entitled «Linguistic, psychological and methodical aspects of using argumentative phrases ...
This paper surveys the contributions to the study of argumentation in the two decades since the work...
Writing about argumentation is a daunting task for at least one main reason. Argumentation occupies ...
1The paper addresses the triggers of the ‘pragmatic dark’ (Viaggio 2002, 229), a frequent predicamen...
2noThe aim of this paper is to explore the status of argumentative discourse. We argue that argument...
In this paper a specific method of interpreting arguments is developed and justified. The aim of thi...
The contrastive rhetoric hypothesis (Kaplan, 1966) predicts that language users across cultures will...
The main aim of an argumentative speech act complex, as defined in argumentation theory, is to resol...
The article offers a discourse-analytic examination of original (English) and interpreted (Polish) v...
This book explores the construction of agreement in the argumentative process, aiming to investigate...
In everyday discourse we retrieve the meaning of verbal or written utterances by means of different ...
This book shows how research in linguistic pragmatics, philosophy of language, and rhetoric can be c...
none4siThis paper shows how defeasible argumentation schemes can be used to represent the logical st...