The case of Drazen Erdemovic raises the question whether a soldier may rely on the defence of duress if he shoots a large number of civilians because his superior has threatened to kill him if he does not carry out that unlawful command. This problem has engendered much controversy within the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia and beyond, with Judge Antonio Cassese at the forefront of the debate. The author comes to the conclusion that duress may, depending on the circumstances, provide a justification as well as an excuse, but that it depends on issues of fact whether Drazen Erdemovic could have claimed either
Grounds for Excluding Criminal Responsibility in International Criminal Law This thesis aims on curr...
In his recent book Killing in War, McMahan develops a powerful argument for the view that soldiers o...
To Do, To Die, To Reason Why offers a new account of the ethics of war and the legal regulation of w...
This Article discusses the Erdemovic case in order toexamine whether duress should be a defense to a...
This thesis aims on the issue of duress as ground for excluding criminal responsibility in internati...
This thesis aims on the issue of duress as ground for excluding criminal responsibility in internati...
This Article discusses the Erdemovic case in order to examine whether duress should be a defense to ...
Drazen Erdemovic. The name may be unfamiliar to many outside the former Yugoslavia. The name will su...
The phenomenon of child soldiers encompasses up to half a million of adolescents around the world an...
This dissertation examines the problem of the mistaken killing of civilians in armed conflict. This ...
Duress is a common law defence that has existed since at least the 13th century. It was initially u...
Necessity and duress are circumstances that exclude unlawfulness and existence of a criminal offence...
This book explores the unique social and environmental factors which influence soldiers to commit wa...
With the closure of the ICTY and local judiciaries continuing prosecuting individuals for war crimes...
The reductivist view of war holds that the moral rules of killing in war can be reduced to the moral...
Grounds for Excluding Criminal Responsibility in International Criminal Law This thesis aims on curr...
In his recent book Killing in War, McMahan develops a powerful argument for the view that soldiers o...
To Do, To Die, To Reason Why offers a new account of the ethics of war and the legal regulation of w...
This Article discusses the Erdemovic case in order toexamine whether duress should be a defense to a...
This thesis aims on the issue of duress as ground for excluding criminal responsibility in internati...
This thesis aims on the issue of duress as ground for excluding criminal responsibility in internati...
This Article discusses the Erdemovic case in order to examine whether duress should be a defense to ...
Drazen Erdemovic. The name may be unfamiliar to many outside the former Yugoslavia. The name will su...
The phenomenon of child soldiers encompasses up to half a million of adolescents around the world an...
This dissertation examines the problem of the mistaken killing of civilians in armed conflict. This ...
Duress is a common law defence that has existed since at least the 13th century. It was initially u...
Necessity and duress are circumstances that exclude unlawfulness and existence of a criminal offence...
This book explores the unique social and environmental factors which influence soldiers to commit wa...
With the closure of the ICTY and local judiciaries continuing prosecuting individuals for war crimes...
The reductivist view of war holds that the moral rules of killing in war can be reduced to the moral...
Grounds for Excluding Criminal Responsibility in International Criminal Law This thesis aims on curr...
In his recent book Killing in War, McMahan develops a powerful argument for the view that soldiers o...
To Do, To Die, To Reason Why offers a new account of the ethics of war and the legal regulation of w...